Abstract
Private and public breeding programs, as well as companies and universities, have developed different genomics technologies which have resulted in the generation of unprecedented amounts of sequence data, which bring new challenges in terms of data management, query, and analysis. The magnitude and complexity of these datasets bring new challenges but also an opportunity to use the data available as a whole. Detailed phenotype data, combined with increasing amounts of genomic data, have an enormous potential to accelerate the identification of key traits to improve our understanding of quantitative genetics. Data harmonization enables cross-national and international comparative research, facilitating the extraction of new scientific knowledge. In this paper, we address the complex issue of combining high dimensional and unbalanced omics data. More specifically, we propose a covariance-based method for combining partial datasets in the genotype to phenotype spectrum. This method can be used to combine partially overlapping relationship/covariance matrices. Here, we show with applications that our approach might be advantageous to feature imputation based approaches; we demonstrate how this method can be used in genomic prediction using heterogenous marker data and also how to combine the data from multiple phenotypic experiments to make inferences about previously unobserved trait relationships. Our results demonstrate that it is possible to harmonize datasets to improve available information across gene-banks, data repositories or other data resources.
Key message Several covariance matrices obtained from independent experiments can be combined as long as these matrices are partially overlapping. We demonstrate the usefulness of this methodology with applications in combining data from several partially linked genotypic and phenotypic experiments.
Author contribution statement –DA: Conception or design of the work, statistics, R programs, simulations, drafting the article, and critical revision of the article.
–JIS: R programs, graphs, drafting the article, critical revision of the article.
–RK: Critical revision of the article.
Footnotes
This research was supported by WheatSustain.
additional figures and text
↵3 In certain instances, the union of the genotypes in the parts did not recover all of the NT otal genotypes, therefore this calculation was based on the recovered part of the full genomic relationship matrix
↵4 Σ = diag(b + 1) + .21n×n where bi for i = 1, 2, …, n are i.i.d. uniform between 0 and 1.
↵5 Σ0 = diag(.5b + 1) + .3 *b01n×n where bi for i = 0, 2, …, n are i.i.d. uniform between 0 and 1.