New Results
Implicit bias is strongest when assessing top candidates
View ORCID ProfileEmma R Andersson, Carolina Hagberg, Sara Hägg
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/859298
Emma R Andersson
1Department of Biosciences and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
2Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
Carolina Hagberg
3Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
Sara Hägg
4Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden

Article usage
Posted December 03, 2019.
Implicit bias is strongest when assessing top candidates
Emma R Andersson, Carolina Hagberg, Sara Hägg
bioRxiv 859298; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/859298
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (10324)
- Bioengineering (7649)
- Bioinformatics (26274)
- Biophysics (13489)
- Cancer Biology (10659)
- Cell Biology (15386)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (8474)
- Ecology (12795)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (16811)
- Genetics (11377)
- Genomics (15443)
- Immunology (10589)
- Microbiology (25111)
- Molecular Biology (10183)
- Neuroscience (54295)
- Paleontology (399)
- Pathology (1663)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (2886)
- Physiology (4330)
- Plant Biology (9221)
- Synthetic Biology (2548)
- Systems Biology (6766)
- Zoology (1459)