Role of the antiparallel double-stranded filament form of FtsA in activating the Escherichia coli divisome

The actin-like FtsA protein is essential for function of the cell division machinery, or divisome, in many bacteria including Escherichia coli. Previous in vitro studies demonstrated that purified wild-type FtsA assembles into closed mini-rings on lipid membranes, but oligomeric variants of FtsA such as FtsAR286W and FtsAG50E can bypass certain divisome defects and form arc and double-stranded (DS) oligomeric states, respectively, which may reflect conversion of an inactive to an active form of FtsA. Yet, it remains unproven which oligomeric forms of FtsA are responsible for assembling and activating the divisome. Here we used an in vivo crosslinking assay for FtsA DS filaments to show that they largely depend on proper divisome assembly and are prevalent at later stages of cell division. We also used a previously reported variant that fails to assemble DS filaments, FtsAM96E R153D, to investigate the roles of FtsA oligomeric states in divisome assembly and activation. We show that FtsAM96E R153D cannot form DS filaments in vivo, fails to replace native FtsA, and confers a dominant negative phenotype, underscoring the importance of the DS filament stage for FtsA function. Surprisingly, however, activation of the divisome through the ftsL* or ftsW* superfission alleles suppressed the dominant negative phenotype and rescued the functionallity of FtsAM96E R153D. Our results suggest that FtsA DS filaments are needed for divisome activation once it is assembled, but they are not essential for divisome assembly or guiding septum synthesis.


IMPORTANCE
Cell division is fundamental for cellular duplication.In simple cells like Escherichia coli bacteria, the actin homolog FtsA is essential for cell division and assembles into a variety of protein filaments at the cytoplasmic membrane.These filaments help to tether polymers of the tubulinlike FtsZ to the membrane at early stages of cell division, but also play crucial roles in recruiting other cell division proteins to a complex called the divisome.Once assembled, the E. coli divisome subsequently activates synthesis of the division septum that splits the cell in two.One recently discovered oligomeric conformation of FtsA is an antiparallel double stranded filament.
Using a combination of in vivo crosslinking and genetics, we provide evidence suggesting that these FtsA double filaments have a crucial role in activating the septum synthesis enzymes.

INTRODUCTION
Bacterial cytokinesis relies on a dynamic protein nanomachine called the divisome, which is organized in a ring-like complex at mid-cell by the tubulin-like FtsZ protein (1)(2)(3).Actin-like FtsA protein plays a crucial role during early FtsZ-ring formation by anchoring FtsZ to the cytoplasmic membrane at the proto-ring stage (Fig. 1) and facilitating the recruitment of other essential divisome proteins (4,5).Later in cytokinesis, synthesis of the division septum in most bacteria requires the action of the transmembrane proteins FtsW and FtsI, which harbor essential septal glycosyltransferase and transpeptidase activities, respectively, in their periplasmic domains (6)(7)(8).FtsWI in turn are recruited to the divisome by the FtsQLB transmembrane protein complex (9)(10)(11) and are kept in an inactive state by the periplasmic domains of FtsL and FtsB, collectively called constriction control domains (12).Thus, E. coli cell division features two temporally distinct stages (13): first assembly of the divisome machinery, then activation of FtsWI to synthesize the division septum.
Significant progress has been made recently in understanding how the E. coli divisome is assembled and FtsWI becomes activated.Hypermorphic alleles of FtsA, designated FtsA*, were initially found capable of bypassing the essential ZipA protein as well as other divisome defects (14)(15)(16).These FtsA* alleles were found to be deficient in oligomer formation compared with WT FtsA, according to two-hybrid studies (17).Subsequent in vitro studies demonstrated that purified FtsA forms closed 12-mer rings on lipid membranes, whereas FtsA* variants instead tended to assemble into arcs and other non-miniring structures, including double stranded (DS) filaments under certain conditions (18,19).FtsA* also was shown in reconstitution experiments with FtsZ to form more dynamic structures on lipid membranes compared with WT FtsA (20).These biochemical and genetic studies suggested that FtsA oligomeric state regulates a divisome checkpoint, and disruption of FtsA minirings inactivates the checkpoint and allows FtsQLB and FtsWI to be recruited to the divisome (1,17).
As mentioned above, FtsQLB themselves are key regulators of FtsWI activity.This was initially revealed by hypermorphic alleles of FtsB and FtsL, designated FtsB* and FtsL*, which harbor residue changes in their periplasmic domains that prematurely and constitutively activate FtsWI (12,21).The FtsQLB complex was later shown to be sufficient to promote FtsWI enzymatic activity in vitro (6).In the periplasm, this activation is mainly mediated through a domain in FtsL (AWI) that interacts with FtsI (22).Moreover, hypermorphic variants of FtsW and FtsI, FtsW* and FtsI* have been isolated that mimic the activated state induced by FtsL* and FtsB* (22)(23)(24), suggesting that FtsWI activation is the endpoint of these regulatory pathways.
Like the original FtsA* allele, these hypermorphic alleles of FtsL, FtsB, FtsW and FtsI promote septum formation prematurely and at shorter cell lengths, resulting in significantly shorter cells (12,21,25).Combinations of some of these hypermorphic alleles synergize to form nearly spherical cells (12), presumably because the septum synthesis activity exceeds activity of the elongasome, which is normally dominant and results in the rod shape of E. coli and other bacilli (26,27).
The prevailing model for how FtsA functions in E. coli cell division involves several oligomeric state changes, which have been observed in vitro but largely only inferred in vivo (1,28).In this model, FtsA initially self-interacts strongly to form minirings on the membrane (19,29,30).Upon a signal yet to be elucidated, it is postulated that these FtsA minirings are then disrupted by interactions with the other essential FtsZ membrane anchor protein ZipA (31)(32)(33) and perhaps other partners such as the divisome protein FtsX (34) or FtsQ (35) to form curved oligomers (arcs) that, unlike minirings, seem to allow recruitment of downstream divisome proteins, including FtsN.
The cytoplasmic domain of FtsN (FtsNcyto), potentially in partnership with other divisome proteins, interacts directly with FtsA (36,37).Recently it was discovered that high concentrations of purified FtsNcyto can convert FtsA minirings or arcs into DS filaments on lipid membranes (30).These DS filaments are antiparallel, similar to DS filaments formed by another bacterial actin homolog, MreB (30,38) that guide the peptidoglycan synthesis machinery of the elongasome to maintain the cylindrical shape of the bacterial cell wall (39).Notably, the FtsA G50E variant can form DS filaments on membranes constitutively, independently of FtsNcyto (19,30).This behavior suggested that FtsA G50E , originally isolated as an FtsA*-like allele that suppressed a thermosensitive allele of FtsA (FtsA S195P ) in cis (40), represents another activated oligomeric form of FtsA.As the majority of FtsN is recruited at a late stage of divisome assembly and is important for divisome activation (41,42), it is attractive to propose that DS filaments reflect an endpoint oligomeric state of FtsA that acts late in septum formation.Because they are curved and oligomerize along the inner membrane surface, these DS filaments were postulated to be crucial for guiding septum synthesis (30).Their antiparallel structure abrogates their ability to treadmill, so Nierhaus et al. hypothesized that DS filaments guide septum synthesis by acting as rudders to steer septal wall synthesis driven by FtsWI, analogous to the rudder mechanism proposed to confer the spatial regulation of the elongasome by MreB DS filaments (30,39).
In the present study, we ask whether these DS filaments of FtsA are required for physically guiding septum synthesis, as proposed.We use site-specific cysteine crosslinking to show that FtsA DS filaments form later in cell division and largely depend on divisome assembly, consistent with the idea that DS filaments are mainly assembled close to the divisome activation stage.We show that the DS filament-forming FtsA G50E variant does not bypass ZipA very efficiently compared with FtsA R286W , consistent with the idea that DS filaments act at the later activation stage.Moreover, we show that a variant of FtsA unable to form DS filaments is not only non-functional in cell division but also exhibits a dominant negative phenotype, which cannot be alleviated by incorporating FtsA*-like mutations.Surprisingly, however, this variant can support normal divisome assembly and cell division if the divisome is activated by ftsL* or ftsW* hypermorphic alleles.This leads us to conclude that although DS filaments of FtsA are not essential for guiding septum synthesis, they play a key role in the activation of the divisome.

RESULTS
Q155C can be used to detect the double stranded filament form of FtsA by in vivo crosslinking and does not affect normal FtsA function.Previously, it was shown that expression of the FtsA Q155C variant could detect DS filaments of FtsA in E. coli cells by sitespecific cysteine crosslinking with another Q155C residue on the antiparallel FtsA filament (30).
As the distance between the Q155C residues in each FtsA filament is 12.6 Å in the atomic structure (Fig. 2A), thiol crosslinkers with sufficiently long linker arms, such as BMH (13-16 Å) or BMB (11 Å), could efficiently capture the interaction and resulted in a single prominent crosslinked species on immunoblots from SDS-PAGE (30).Nierhaus et al. showed that this ftsA Q155C variant, fused to an internal 3X HA tag for immunodetection, was able to replace the WT ftsA at the native locus of E. coli; these cells divided normally, indicating that the Q155C residue change did not detectably affect FtsA function (30).We confirmed that when expressed from a plasmid, FtsA Q155C with an N-terminal FLAG tag (but lacking the 3X HA tag used previously) can complement an ftsA null allele and confer normal cell division (data not shown and see below).We then used this site-specific crosslinked band as a direct measure of the prevalence of FtsA DS filaments in cells under various conditions.

DS filaments of FtsA increase at later stages of division.
The prediction inferred from the ability of FtsNcyto to convert FtsA minirings into DS filaments is that DS filaments appear later in the septation process.To test this idea, we measured the prevalence of DS filaments during a synchronized cell division time course.We achieved transient cell division synchrony by using the well-known ftsZ84(ts) allele, which rapidly inactivates Z rings upon temperature shift to 42˚C and rapidly restores them upon shift back to 30˚C (25).As a result of this restoration, divisomes are rebuilt rapidly, and nondividing cells growing in rich medium such as LB generally begin dividing again 20-30 minutes after the downshift (Fig. 2B and data not shown).We therefore used these reactivation conditions to determine whether FtsA DS filaments assembled late during the cell division cycle as hypothesized.
Cells with the ftsZ84(ts) allele and carrying pDSW210-FLAG-FtsA Q155C were shifted to 42˚C to disassemble divisomes and then harvested for cysteine crosslinking 0, 10, and 20 minutes after returning to 30˚C.Protein samples from these time points were separated by SDS-PAGE, followed by immunoblotting with anti-FtsA antibody to detect FtsA.We found that the FtsA Q155C crosslinked band, initially nearly undetectable, increased several-fold in intensity over time at 30˚C, consistent with the assembly of most DS filaments at late stages of septation (Fig. 2C,D).This band consistently migrated at ~125 kDa with SDS-PAGE, which is larger than the predicted FtsA dimer size of ~90 kDa; however, unexpectedly slow migration of crosslinked bands with SDS-PAGE is often observed with other in vivo crosslinking assays (43) and was previously observed specifically with FtsA Q155C (30).
To independently assess FtsA-FtsA interactions not directly involved in DS filaments, we constructed FtsA S407C , with a cysteine substitution in the amphipathic membrane targeting helix (MTH) FtsA uses for binding to the membrane (4).Examination of high resolution tomograms of negatively stained minirings on lipids suggests that these MTHs could potentially form an internal ring inside the 20 nm-diameter miniring, potentially placing them in close contact with each other (18).We also hypothesized that at least a subset of MTHs should similarly interact with each other at the membrane surface when FtsA is assembled in other oligomeric structures.Indeed, the immunoblots indicated that FtsA S407C can efficiently crosslink with FtsA 407C residues on other FtsA subunits when BMB or BMH crosslinkers are used, yielding crosslinked bands at ~90 kDa, the expected size of an FtsA dimer (Fig. 2C).As with FtsA Q155C , FtsA S407C complemented an ftsA null mutant and allowed normal cell division (data not shown), indicating that the serine to cysteine change did not appreciably disrupt the amphipathic nature of the helix.Notably, whereas FtsA Q155C crosslinking increased significantly upon resumption of cell division, FtsA S407C crosslinking remained relatively constant over time, indicating that the observed increase in FtsA Q155C crosslinking arises from specific FtsA-FtsA lateral interactions at the DS filament interface and not from an overall increase in FtsA-FtsA interactions as cell division progresses.We also tested another crosslinking residue, D123C, which like Q155C detects DS filaments in vivo but with a much closer molecular interaction (~3.6 Å) (30).As a result, this interaction cannot be detected by BMB or BMH but can be detected by the shorter ~5 Å crosslinker dBBR (30).As with Q155C, we saw a 2-3-fold increase in crosslinking at D123C after resumption of cell division in the ftsZ84 strain, although the efficiency of crosslinking was lower (Fig. S1).
FtsA DS filaments depend on normal divisome assembly.To provide more evidence that DS filaments of FtsA form at a later stage of the cell division cycle, we asked whether DS filament formation would be hindered by disrupting divisome assembly.To assess this, we introduced pDSW210-FLAG-FtsA Q155C into strains with zipA1(ts) or ftsQ1(ts) alleles, as both fail to recruit downstream divisome proteins at the nonpermissive temperature of 42˚C (44)(45)(46).We then compared the intensity of crosslinked bands on immunoblots at the permissive or nonpermissive temperatures.Additionally, we included a strain carrying the pDSW210-FLAG-FtsA Q155C with an ftsA null allele in the chromosome as a control to account for the effects of thermal induction.
When grown at 30˚C, all three strains displayed the expected prominent crosslinked bands at ~125 kDa (Fig. 3).However, after shifting to 42˚C for 1 h, the intensities of the crosslinked bands in the zipA1 and ftsQ1 mutants decreased 7.5-fold and 3-fold, whereas the intensities of the bands in the complemented ftsA mutant remained nearly the same.As essentially all zipA1 and ftsQ1 cells were highly filamentous at this time point at 42˚C (data not shown), it is possible that the weak but detectable crosslinked protein bands represent DS filaments that formed before the thermal shift, which failed to disassemble.
Overall, these data suggest that formation of FtsA DS filaments largely depends on assembly of the divisome, at least up to the FtsQ-dependent step.As ZipA is important for recruiting all divisome proteins downstream of FtsA and FtsZ and is postulated to be involved in switching FtsA minirings to arcs and/or DS filaments, our results are consistent with this model.
They are also consistent with the increase in DS filaments at later stages of septation, as shown above.
Residue changes that promote or block FtsA DS filament formation in vivo.We hypothesized that the cysteine crosslinking assay should be able to detect higher levels of crosslinking in cells expressing FtsA G50E compared to WT FtsA, assuming FtsA G50E forms DS filaments constitutively in vivo.We therefore compared the crosslinked bands on immunoblots, and indeed FtsA G50E Q155C reproducibly gave rise to more intense crosslinked protein bands at ~125 kDa compared with FtsA Q155C alone (Fig. 4, Fig. S2).As a control, we tested whether the presence of G50E affected the MTH-MTH interaction probed by crosslinking at S407C, but there was no increase in band intensity at ~90 kDa (Fig. 4).This provides additional evidence, already suggested by the time course of crosslinking depicted in Fig. 2, that the intensity of crosslinked protein bands from FtsA Q155C can be used to assess the prevalence of DS filament formation in the cell population.
We next wanted to test the effects of an FtsA variant reported to be defective in forming DS filaments.This variant of FtsA, FtsA M96E R153D , was previously designed based on the atomic structure to inhibit interaction between two antiparallel FtsA filaments (Fig. 2A) (30).In that study, a purified form of this variant formed robust minirings on lipid monolayers but, unlike WT FtsA, was unable to form typical DS filaments in vitro upon addition of purified FtsNcyto (30).
To test the consequences of this defect on E. coli cell division, we first synthesized an internal portion of the ftsA gene encoding these two residue changes and replaced the WT ftsA in pSEB440, a medium copy plasmid with a trc promoter and relatively weak expression upon IPTG induction (47,48), with the double mutant insert.This plasmid was chosen because of concerns that the double mutant might be dominant negative (see below).The double mutant ftsA M96E R153D was also cloned into the higher-copy number plasmid pDSW210 so that it could be expressed at higher levels from its PTrc promoter for the cysteine crosslinking assays.Mutations encoding the Q155C and S407C residue changes were incorporated into the pDSW210-FtsA M96E R153D plasmid to create triple mutants for cysteine crosslinking in vivo.As we suspected, cells carrying the pDSW210 derivatives of the double and triple mutants needed to be grown on 0.2 % glucose to repress the PTrc promoter, as the cells grew poorly otherwise, likely due to a dominant negative effect of the double mutant (see below, and Fig. 5A).
Cysteine crosslinking experiments with FtsA M96E R153D Q155C and FtsA M96E R153D S407C derivatives showed that the ~125 kDa band that represents crosslinking between Q155C residues in DS filaments was either undetectable or weak in repeat experiments (Fig. 4 and data not shown), indicating that the M96E and R153D residue changes strongly block formation of DS filaments in vivo.Crosslinking at S407C in the FtsA M96E R153D double variant was also weaker compared to WT FtsA or FtsA G50E , but still detectable (Fig. 4 and data not shown).We conclude that the FtsA M96E R153D double variant largely fails to assemble DS filaments in vivo, even when native FtsA is present.
The dominant negative phenotype of FtsA M96E R153D is suppressed by superfission alleles.
As mentioned above, FtsA M96E R153D derivatives were dominant negative, as certain strains could not be transformed by pDSW210-FtsA M96E R153D in the absence of 0.2% glucose (Fig. 5A).This dominant negative phenotype could be explained if some defective subunits interacting with WT FtsA through longitudinal interactions prevented their co-assembly into DS filaments.
However, we hypothesized that perhaps a superfission allele such as ftsL*, might suppress the dominant negative phenotype by stimulating septum synthesis, as it can rescue other cases of divisome inhibition (21,22).Consistent with this idea, we found that pDSW210-FtsA M96E R153D could efficiently be transformed into WM4953, which expresses ftsL* from its native chromosomal locus and is isogenic with the ftsL+ WM4952 strain (Fig. 5A).
We surmised that another potential way to suppress the dominant negative effect of the double mutant was to incorporate G50E or R286W residue changes into the pDSW210-FtsA M96E R153D plasmid to make two new triple variants.However, despite the known capability of G50E and R286W to suppress divisome defects, including suppression of other dominant negative mutants (19,48,49), they were unable to suppress the M96E R153D alterations that block DS filament formation.Instead, the triple variants remained dominant negative and failed to transform WM4952 (Fig. 5A) when selected on LB agar without added glucose to repress expression and under conditions where native FtsA was present (see below for additional description of this strain).
The inability of the G50E alteration to suppress the FtsA M96E R153D dominant negative effect is consistent with the idea that the G50E residue change, despite its ability to promote DS filament formation in otherwise WT FtsA, does not have the capability to override the block to DS filament formation caused by FtsA M96E R153D .Moreover, the inability of R286W to suppress the FtsA M96E R153D dominant negative phenotype suggests that FtsA needs to form DS filaments in order to complete the stimulation conferred by the R286W allele.This contrasts with the ability of the R286W residue change to suppress dominant negative alleles of FtsA such as FtsA M71A (49) probably because the latter may favor an oligomeric state that occurs earlier in the process of cell division, such as divisome assembly, that is counteracted by R286W.In support of this idea, FtsA M71A forms DS filaments significantly less well than WT FtsA (~35% of WT levels) as measured by in vivo crosslinking at Q155C, but introduction of the R286W residue change to FtsA M71A restores DS filament formation back to WT levels (Fig. S3).
As with the double variant, the triple variant constructs could be efficiently transformed into the ftsL* strain WM4953, allowing us to investigate their effects on cell division and viability in more detail.We first asked whether FtsA M96E R153D retained any dominant negative effect in the presence of ftsL* compared with WT FtsA and the triple mutants.As seen in row 3 of the top panels in Fig. 5B, the double mutant retained some dominant negative properties compared with WT FtsA, which displayed no dominant negative effects at this induction level (row 2).
In contrast with the results from the ftsL+ WM4952 strain, the G50E or R286W residue changes in the FtsA M96E R153D constructs in the ftsL* WM4953 strain suppressed the dominant negative effects when native FtsA was present (Fig. 5B top panels, rows 4-5).This suppression by G50E or R286W was more pronounced than that achieved by ftsL* alone, as shown by the normal viability of both triple mutants at 100 µM IPTG.This suggests that ftsL* synergizes with G50E or R286W to compensate for the lack of FtsA DS filaments.
The FtsA M96E R153D variant is unable to replace FtsA unless rescued by ftsL*.We then asked whether these FtsA variants were able to support cell division after native FtsA is depleted.
Strains WM4952 and WM4953 harbor an ftsA null (ftsA o , frameshift) allele in the chromosome and a low-copy plasmid that expresses WT ftsA from the bacteriophage lambda PR promoter along with its thermosensitive cI857 repressor.At temperatures >37˚C, the repressor is thermoinactivated, allowing WT FtsA to complement and cells to divide normally.However, shifting the temperature to 30˚C or lower allows the repressor to inhibit PR, which severely depletes FtsA from cells (21), resulting in complete inhibition of cell division in the ftsL+ strain WM4952.
Previously it was shown that in WM4953 expressing the ftsL* allele, when cellular FtsA is significantly depleted by growth at 30˚C for several mass doublings, cell division is only mildly impaired (21).This reduced requirement for FtsA may occur because divisome activation by ftsL* bypasses the requirement of most FtsA in the cell.Nonetheless, ftsL* cannot bypass an ftsA o allele, indicating that some FtsA is still required for division in ftsL* mutant cells (21), probably because FtsA is needed at least for recruitment of FtsL to the divisome.Moreover, the original ftsL* allele (FtsL E88K ) cannot bypass the loss of ZipA either (data not shown), presumably because ZipA is needed for recruitment of all downstream divisome proteins including FtsL.
To assess the functionality of FtsA variants, we first expressed them from pDSW210 derivatives under conditions (growth at 30˚C) that depleted FtsA in either WM4952 or WM4953.
As expected, cells with the pDSW210 vector control lost viability but cells expressing WT FtsA from pDSW210 retained normal viability (Fig. 5B, bottom panel, rows 1-2), even with no IPTG.This was expected, as there is sufficient leaky expression from pDSW210 with no IPTG to complement an ftsA null allele even in an ftsL+ strain (47).Notably, however, FtsA-depleted ftsL* cells expressing FtsA M96E R153D also exhibited normal viability with 0 or 25 µM IPTG, and showed a slight dominant negative effect at 100 µM IPTG (Fig. 5B, bottom panels, row 3), similar to the modest dominant negative effect in FtsA-replete cells mentioned above (Fig. 5B, top panels, row 3).This suggests that the double mutant retains at least partial function, provided that ftsL* is present.Importantly, crosslinking experiments with the same FtsA M96E R153D variant expressed from pDSW210 showed that it remains deficient in forming DS filaments in WM4953 (Fig. S2), ruling out the possibility that ftsL* somehow allows restoration of DS filament formation.
The FtsA M96E R153D R286W triple variant behaved similarly to the double variant, except there was no dominant negative effect (Fig. 5B, bottom panels, row 5).This suggests that when it is the main FtsA in the cell, the R286W variant synergizes with ftsL* to bypass the block to DS filament formation.We were surprised, however, to find that the FtsA M96E R153D G50E triple variant grew poorly at several IPTG induction levels after FtsA depletion (Fig. 5B, bottom panels, row 4).This finding suggests that when it is in the predominant FtsA in cells harboring the ftsL* allele, the G50E residue change confers a dominant negative effect.
We then assessed the functionality of the FtsA variants when expressed from pSEB440, which allowed for finer control of ftsA expression.We used IPTG to induce expression of the different pSEB440-FtsA constructs under conditions (30˚C growth) that depleted FtsA.As expected, depletion of native FtsA in ftsL+ WM4952 derivatives with the pSEB439 empty vector resulted in no viability (Fig. 5C, row 1) and long filamentous cells (Fig. 5D, top panels).WT FtsA restored full viability, but only after induction with IPTG (Fig. 5C row 2) and cell morphology was normal upon IPTG induction (Fig. 5D, top panels).Notably, although FtsA M96E R153D and its triple variant derivatives could be introduced into WM4952 because of lower expression levels, they were unable to complement FtsA-depleted WM4952 even after IPTG induction (Fig. 5C, rows 3-5), and formed long filamentous cells (Fig. 5C left panels, rows 3-5; Fig. 5D, top panels).These results indicated that neither FtsA M96E R153D nor the addition of G50E or R286W changes can replace native FtsA for function.
To confirm that these detrimental effects on viability were due to cell division defects, we compared the morphology of cells expressing FtsA M96E R153D or the triple variants to that of cells expressing WT FtsA.Cells expressing FtsA M96E R153D or FtsA M96E R153D R286W divided, but less well than those expressing WT FtsA, with about half of the cells showing some degree of elongation (Fig. 5D, bottom panels 2, 3, 5).As predicted from the lower viability, cells expressing FtsA M96E R153D G50E (Fig. 5D, fourth bottom panel) formed longer filaments, consistent with the negative synergy between G50E and ftsL*.
The FtsA M96E R153D variant can function as the sole FtsA in cells carrying the ftsL* allele.As FtsA M96E R153D could allow cells with the ftsL* allele to divide fairly well when WT FtsA was depleted, we then asked if FtsA M96E R153D could function as the sole FtsA in the cell with no WT FtsA present.Using a P1 phage lysate carrying a leuA::Tn10 tetracycline resistance (tet R ) marker, which is ~50% linked to the ftsA o allele by cotransduction (Fig. 6A), we transduced a WT ftsL+ strain carrying pSEB440-FtsA M96E R153D to tet R in the presence of 25-50 µM IPTG.We found that 100% of tet R transductants tested retained the WT ftsA allele, indicating that FtsA M96E R153D cannot function as the sole FtsA in an otherwise WT cell (data not shown) and consistent with its inability to complement WM4952 under FtsA depletion conditions (Fig. 5C, D) We then repeated the transductions, this time with a phage lysate carrying leuA::Tn10, ftsL* and ftsA o in that gene order (from WM4953), such that 100% of tet R recipients receiving the ftsA o allele would also acquire the ftsL* allele (Fig. 6A).With a WT strain carrying pSEB440-FtsA M96E R153D as recipient, we reproducibly isolated ~50% transductants that were dependent on IPTG for full viability, indicating that the cells now required FtsA M96E R153D expressed from the plasmid for survival.A representative sample of 4 transductants out of dozens tested is shown in Fig. 6B.Microscopic examination of these cells revealed that 3 of the 4 were dependent on IPTG for cell division, and we confirmed that these isolates (A, B, D in Fig. 6B) had the ftsA o allele and that the plasmid in these strains retained the FtsA M96E R153D residue changes (Fig. 6B and data not shown).The ~50% cotransduction frequency of the ftsA o allele with the leuA::Tn10 tet R marker, as predicted from their 20 kb distance in the genome (Fig. 6A), also argues against the acquisition of extragenic suppressors, as these would be expected to arise at frequencies significantly lower than 50%.
The FtsA M96E R153D variant is capable of recruiting FtsN to the divisome.The ability of FtsL* to allow the FtsA M96E R153D variant to function in cell division in the absence of WT FtsA strongly suggests that FtsA M96E R153D can still successfully recruit downstream proteins, including FtsL*, to the divisome.Nonetheless, it is possible that the FtsA M96E R153D variant, in the presence of ftsL*, might be able to bypass some of the normal divisome assembly pathway.We explored this by testing if the late divisome protein FtsN could localize in ftsA o ftsL* cells that were dependent on FtsA M96E R153D for division and viability.We introduced pSEB440-FtsA M96E R153D into a strain expressing a GFP-FtsN fusion at its native chromosomal locus (XTL970), then introduced the ftsL* ftsA o alleles into the chromosome by P1 transduction.The resulting strain (WM7518) was confirmed by whole genome sequencing to carry ftsL* and ftsA o in the chromosome and to carry pSEB440-expressing FtsA M96E R153D (data not shown).Complete viability of this strain was dependent on IPTG (Fig. 7A), as expected, although partial viability with no IPTG was also expected given the suppressing effects of ftsL* on the amount of FtsA required for cell division as described above.
Upon microscopic examination, we found robust GFP-FtsN fluorescent signals localized at divisomes in essentially all the cells (Fig. 7B), both early during the division process as well as in deeply constricting cells.This indicates that recruitment of later proteins by FtsA M96E R153D is complete and suggests that FtsA-dependent recruitment of divisome proteins such as FtsN does not depend on the DS filament form of FtsA.The clear localization of GFP-FtsN to sharply constricting division septa also indicates that FtsN persists throughout cytokinesis, as is the case in WT cells (Soderstrom et al. 2016).
The defect in forming DS filaments can be rescued by either ftsL** or ftsW* superfission alleles expressed from plasmids.To show independently that the ftsL* superfission allele could rescue the FtsA M96E R153D defect and be able to switch ftsL* on when needed, we cloned a strong ftsL superfission allele, ftsL E88K G92D (22), which we call ftsL**, into the arabinose-inducible plasmid pBAD18.We then evaluated its capacity to restore cell division in the ftsL+ WM4952 strain carrying pSEB440-FtsA M96E R153D after FtsA depletion at 30˚C and induction with arabinose.A control strain expressing WT ftsL instead of ftsL** from pBAD18 was also included for comparison.
We found that induction with IPTG and arabinose to express both FtsA M96E R153D and FtsL** could fully rescue viability after FtsA depletion (Fig. 8A, bottom panels, row 2; Fig. 8B, left panel, row 3) and resulted in normal division of most FtsA-depleted cells in the population (Fig. 8C, left panel).As expected, IPTG induction of FtsA M96E R153D alone did not help, and arabinose induction of FtsL** alone only partially suppressed FtsA depletion, consistent with previous observations that cells can divide with lower levels of FtsA when ftsL* is present as mentioned above (21).In contrast to FtsL**, expression of WT FtsL with arabinose did not rescue viability of FtsA-depleted cells (Fig. 8A, bottom panels, row 2; Fig. 8C while depleted for native FtsA.Although low levels of IPTG (30 µM) were unable to rescue viability of colonies on plates (Fig. 8A), high levels of IPTG (300 µM) could restore full viability (Fig. 8B, C), suggesting that overexpression of ftsW E289G could bypass the need for FtsA DS filaments.These results indicate that both ftsL* and ftsW* superfission alleles can largely bypass the need for FtsA DS filaments, consistent with the idea that DS filaments are needed mainly for activation of FtsWI.
To confirm these results, we asked if FtsL** expressed from the pBAD18 plasmid could support viability of cells expressing FtsA M96E R153D in the complete absence of WT FtsA.We transformed WM7518, which harbors the ftsL* and ftsA o alleles in the chromosome and FtsA M96E R153D expressed from pSEB440, with pBAD18-FtsL**, and then introduced the ∆ftsL::kan knockout allele by P1 transduction, selecting on IPTG and arabinose to express FtsA M96E R153D and FtsL**, respectively (Fig. 8D).All of the resulting transductants were arabinose-dependent as expected, but importantly, half of them were dependent on IPTG for viability and half were viable without IPTG (Fig. 8D), indicating that cell division depends on the expression of FtsA M96E R153D .(Half of the ∆ftsL::kan transductants are expected to become IPTG-independent because the ftsA+ allele is ~50% cotransducible with ∆ftsL::kan).We obtained similar results when we used WM7317 instead of WM7518 (data not shown).Interestingly, we were repeatedly unable to introduce the ftsA o allele by P1 transduction into strains harboring WT ftsL and expressing both FtsL** and FtsA M96E R153D from plasmids under induction conditions (data not shown).In summary, the viability of the ∆ftsL::kan strain complemented by pBAD18-FtsL** suggests that (i) FtsL** produced from a plasmid can permit cell division in the absence of FtsA DS filaments and (ii) WT FtsL somehow interferes with ftsL* superfission alleles, at least in the case of correcting FtsA DS filament defects.
FtsA G50E bypasses ZipA poorly compared with FtsA R286W .The FtsA G50E allele, like other FtsA*-like variants, can complement an ftsA o allele and bypass ZipA (40).As ZipA is normally essential for recruiting downstream divisome proteins, potentially through its role in the disruption of FtsA minirings, this bypass of ZipA by FtsA G50E is consistent with the latter being in a non-miniring oligomeric state.However, FtsA G50E differs from FtsA R286W in that the former seems to bypass the open arc form preferred by the latter variant.If the arc form is preferred for recruitment of FtsK and other downstream divisome proteins, we wondered if the constitutive DS filaments formed by FtsA G50E might compromise its ability to bypass ZipA compared with FtsA R286W , particularly in a strain lacking any other source of FtsA.
To address this question, we used chromosomal ftsA o strains carrying pDSW210 derivatives expressing FtsA R286W , which should bypass ZipA efficiently; FtsA S195P , a thermosensitive variant which should fail to bypass ZipA even at the permissive temperature; and FtsA G50E , and transduced these with the ∆zipA::kan allele, selecting on plates containing 125 µM, 25 µM or 0 µM IPTG to assess the effects of different expression of the FtsA variants.
Higher induction levels of IPTG did not enhance the ability of FtsA G50E to bypass ZipA and instead inhibited growth (Fig. 9 and data not shown).These data suggest that when FtsA G50E is the sole FtsA in the cell, it has a weakened ability to recruit downstream proteins compared with FtsA R286W .

DISCUSSION
Here we have characterized the role of DS filaments of FtsA in E. coli cell division.We provide evidence that DS filaments form late in the process of septation in E. coli, depend upon proper divisome assembly, and are important for divisome activation.The FtsA M96E R153D variant, previously reported to be deficient in forming DS filaments in vitro in response to FtsNcyto, is unable to complement an ftsA null allele in vivo and is strongly dominant negative.This is consistent with the key role of DS filaments in FtsA's cell division functions, and the dominant negative effect indicates that the loss of function of the FtsA M96E R153D variant is not due to degradation, misfolding, or poor expression.Instead, we propose that the dominant negative effect occurs because assembly and stability of DS filaments require most FtsA subunits to interact at the lateral interface, and incorporation of even 1-2 subunits unable to form lateral interactions can destabilize the entire DS filament.
The most compelling evidence for the role of FtsA DS filaments in divisome activation comes from the ability of superfission alleles such as ftsL* or ftsW* to largely suppress the dominant negative effects of FtsA M96E R153D and, even more strikingly, to allow it to function as the main source of FtsA in the cell.Superfission alleles prematurely promote septum synthesis by FtsWI, either by overriding normal signaling pathways from FtsQLB to FtsWI (ftsL*) or by self-activation (ftsW*) (12,(21)(22)(23).Therefore, as superfission alleles can bypass the need for FtsA DS filaments, it strongly suggests that DS filaments are normally involved in activating FtsWI.Although the molecular mechanisms underlying this activation are unclear, the known genetic interaction between FtsA and FtsW suggests that interaction between FtsA DS filaments and the cytoplasmic loops of FtsW, most likely loop 2 (50), triggers conformational changes in FtsW.It is attractive to postulate that these interactions in the cytoplasm, along with conformational changes in the periplasmic domains of FtsW promoted by FtsQLB, FtsI and FtsN, contribute synergistically to turn on FtsW's glycosyltransferase activity (51)(52)(53).
Our results are consistent with the following model.FtsA initially forms minirings on the cytoplasmic membrane that represent a proto-ring checkpoint and are unable to recruit downstream divisome proteins, possibly because they lack free termini (Fig. 10).Then, responding to an unknown signal, ZipA and probably FtsX (33,34) help to convert FtsA minirings into an "early" arc oligomeric state of FtsA, represented by FtsA R286W , which licenses recruitment of downstream divisome proteins.This model then postulates that the distinct "late" oligomeric state of FtsA is triggered by direct binding of FtsNcyto to the FtsA 1C subdomain (30,36,37,48), which tips the equilibrium towards DS filament assembly (Fig. 10).This conformational state is mimicked by FtsA variants such as FtsA G50E .In this model, DS filaments of FtsA are primed to activate FtsWI, likely by interacting more strongly with FtsW as described above; importantly, these DS filaments may have lost their ability to recruit divisome proteins for earlier stages of divisome assembly.The high levels of FtsNcyto required to convert FtsA into DS filaments in vitro (30) suggests that other factors, including DS filaments themselves, may help to promote this transition in vivo.
The ability of FtsA G50E to bypass ZipA weakly, as opposed to not at all like WT FtsA, suggests that the DS filaments are in equilibrium with arcs and that some arcs are present; this is consistent with the small percentage of non-DS filaments on lipid monolayers previously observed with purified FtsA G50E (19,30).Another possibility is that FtsA DS filaments can facilitate back-recruitment of divisome proteins, perhaps through FtsN (48,54), but that this process is likely to be inefficient.The ability of FtsA G50E to complement an ftsA null allele also suggests that ZipA can convert DS filaments into a divisome-recruiting form, or, perhaps more likely, that there are enough residual minirings (or other early structures) formed by FtsA G50E that can be converted into recruiting forms by ZipA or other proteins.Interestingly, two other hypermorphic alleles of FtsA, FtsA I143L and FtsA E124A , can largely bypass FtsN under certain conditions but are poor at bypassing ZipA (12,16,55).They share with FtsA G50E a stronger tendency to form DS filaments on lipid membranes in vitro, as lower concentrations of FtsNcyto are sufficient to convert minirings of FtsAI I143L and FtsA E124A to DS filaments compared with FtsA R286W (30).Moreover, FtsA Y139D , which was previously isolated along with FtsA G50E as a suppressor of FtsA S195P , forms a mixture of arcs and DS filaments, and like FtsA G50E bypasses ZipA less efficiently than FtsA R286W (19,40).This is consistent with the idea that FtsA arcs bypass ZipA more readily than DS filaments.Despite their strong effects on FtsA oligomerization, the inability of the G50E and R286W residue changes to rescue the block to DS filaments caused by the M96E R153D lesions is consistent with the pathway shown in Fig. 10.
The negative synergy between G50E and ftsL* is more difficult to explain, but may be related to the mechanism by which G50E forms mostly DS filaments.G50 is located at the longitudinal interface between FtsA subunits, and G50E therefore likely enhances lateral interactions through an allosteric effect (19).It is possible that this mechanism allows only a small number of FtsA arcs to be formed from minirings (see above) and thus perturbs recruitment of later divisome proteins.As FtsAG50E can complement an ftsA o allele, we speculate that a potential imbalance of divisome proteins might still manage to synthesize the division septum but would prone to failure if hyperstimulated by the ftsL* allele.Clearly more studies of the costs of bypassing divisome checkpoints are needed.
A previous model for FtsA DS filaments proposed that this oligomeric form might play a role analogous to the DS filaments of MreB, which are postulated to act as rudders that sense and respond to membrane curvature, thus shepherding cell wall synthases to work in spatially restricted paths (28,30,39).In this analogy, DS filaments of FtsA would respond to the negative curvature of the invaginating septal membrane, thus spatially restricting FtsWI and perhaps FtsZ polymers to a narrow disc (30).This is an attractive model, particularly as it similar to the proposed mechanism of SepF, another FtsZ membrane anchor conserved in Gram positive bacteria and archaea, which can substitute for FtsA in Bacillus subtilis (5,56,57) and regulates septal morphology (58).The prevalence of DS filaments of FtsA late in the cell division process, observed in this study, is also consistent with the rudder model.
One of the corollaries of such a guiding mechanism for FtsA DS filaments is that they should be essential for septum formation.Indeed, the failure of FtsA M96E R153D to complement an ftsA null allele indicates that DS filaments are essential.However, the surprising ability of ftsL* or ftsW* to bypass the requirement for DS filaments in cell division strongly suggests that their essential function is to activate FtsWI, and not as a crucial membrane guide for septum formation.It remains possible that other proteins have redundant roles with FtsA in guiding septum formation in E. coli.Given that E. coli septum formation involves a fast-moving treadmilling FtsZ track and a slower-moving septal synthase track comprising the FtsQLBWIN proteins (52,59), and that FtsA can interact with proteins in both tracks (20,35,59) it is tempting to speculate that FtsA DS filaments may have a role in disengaging FtsQLBWIN from the FtsZ track.This would help to trigger septal synthase activity and help to spatially regulate it through an indirect mechanism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.All strains and plasmids used for this study are listed in Table S1 in the supplemental material.Bacterial cultures were grown with Lennox lysogeny broth (LB) or agar plates unless otherwise indicated.Strains containing plasmids were supplemented as needed with ampicillin (50 µg/ml), chloramphenicol (15 µg/ml), tetracycline (10 µg/ml), kanamycin (25 µg/ml), IPTG (various concentrations) or L-arabinose (0.2%).Optical density of liquid cultures was assessed at 600 nm (OD600).Strains for plasmid construction were XL1-Blue, Top10, or WM7462 as detailed below.
The mutant gene encoding FtsA M96E R153D was initially synthesized by Azenta Corp. as an internal fragment of the ftsA open reading frame, spanning nucleotides 217-496, and cloned into the pUC-GW-Kan plasmid vector.The internal ftsA gene fragment from this plasmid was the source for replacing the WT ftsA sequences in pSEB440 by Gibson assembly using pSEB440 vector primers 2659 and 2660, and internal primers 2661 and 2662, resulting in pSEB440-FtsA M96E R153D (pWM7215).
To achieve higher expression levels, the ftsA M96E R153D mutant gene from pWM7215 was cloned into the high copy plasmid pDSW210 to make pWM7237.This was done by amplifying the ftsA M96E R153D from pWM7215 with primers 2580 + 2581, cleaving with Kpn I + Asc I, and cloning this fragment into plasmid pWM6246 (pDSW210-FtsA-msfGFP sw ) (47), which was digested with KpnI + AscI (AscI partial digestion, as there are two AscI sites).The successfully cloned insert was screened for the replacement of a large portion of the ftsA gene and its msfGFP sw insert with the smaller double mutant ftsA gene fragment lacking the msfGFP sw insert and verified by sequencing.
To construct a derivative of ftsA M96E R153D for in vivo cysteine crosslinking, we introduced the Q155C change in the pDSW210-FLAG-FtsA derivative pWM7237 by site-directed mutagenesis using primers 2735 and 2736, or the S407C change using primers 2739 and 2740.
Other mutant combinations were made by site-directed mutagenesis.To introduce Q155C or S407C into FtsA G50E , plasmid pWM5733 (pDSW210-FLAG-FtsA G50E ) was used as template for site-directed mutagenesis with primers 2564 and 2634, respectively.Sequences of pSEB440-FtsA derivatives were confirmed by sequencing the PCR product resulting from pSEB440-specific primers 2814 and 2815.The M71A variant was introduced into pWM7049 or pWM7239 by site-directed mutagenesis using primers 906 and 907.
To construct pBAD18-FtsL**, a DNA fragment containing the entire E. coli ftsL reading frame encoding the E88K and G92D residue changes, along with flanking sequences from upstream and downstream of the chromosomal ftsL gene including the ftsL translation initiation site, was synthesized by Twist Bioscience, Inc.This fragment was then cloned downstream of the PBAD promoter on pBAD18-FtsL (pLD45) (60) by in vivo cloning in WM7462 (61), using The replacement of chromosomal ftsL with the kan R cassette was achieved by recombineering, using the lambda Red-inducible strain DY329 (62) carrying pBAD18-FtsL (pLD45).This strain (WM2406) was electroporated with a PCR product amplified from a kan R cassette and containing DNA flanking the ftsL gene using primers 712 + 713.Kan R transformants were selected in the presence of arabinose and verified by their dependence on arabinose and by sequencing the junctions, and one strain was saved as WM2409.This strain was used to make a P1 phage lysate carrying the ∆ftsL::kan allele that would be transduced into WM7593 to make WM7594.
The absence of WT ftsA after transduction with WM4953 lysate was initially verified in strains WM7317 and WM7518 by (i) the IPTG dependence of cell viability and (ii) amplification of the chromosomal ftsQ'-ftsA-ftsZ' region from colony PCR confirming the lack of the unique Bgl II site within the N-terminus of chromosomal ftsA due to the frameshift mutation that marks the ftsA o allele (Fig. 6A).These two strains were also subject to whole genome sequencing (Plasmidsaurus, Inc.), which confirmed that they both harbor the ftsL* and ftsA o alleles in their chromosomes and carried pSEB440 expressing FtsA M96E R153D .This allowed us to conclude that FtsA M96E R153D can replace WT FtsA provided that ftsL* is present.
Because >95% of transductants receiving the ftsA o allele will also replace ftsZ84(ts) with ftsZ+, 100 transductants were screened for IPTG dependence and thermosensitivity.One transductant was isolated that was both IPTG dependent and thermosensitive, and confirmed to be ftsA o ftsZ84(ts).
The failure of ftsL* to bypass ZipA was tested by transducing WM2991 (zipA1ts) with P1 lysate from WM4953 carrying ftsL* closely linked to the leuA::Tn10 marker and selecting for tet R transductants at the permissive temperature of 30˚C.Six transductants were then inoculated into LB broth + tetracycline and grown at 42˚C for several hours, then examined microscopically.Cells in all six cultures were extremely filamentous.In addition, cells from the transductant colonies were longer than normal, a feature of the zipA1 allele and in contrast to the very short cells typical of ftsL* mutant strains.
Strains carrying pDSW210-FLAG-FtsA derivatives and a chromosomal ftsA o allele (WM4566, 4567, 4572) were grown at 30˚C and tested for their ability to bypass zipA by transducing them with a ∆zipA::kan lysate derived from WM1657.Transductants were selected on LB + ampicillin + kanamycin at 30˚C, supplemented with various concentrations of IPTG.
Transductants of the WM4566 and WM4572 strains were examined microscopically by inoculating a single colony in corresponding liquid medium and growing until mid-logarithmic phase.
Serial dilution plating assays.Overnight cultures were diluted 1:200 in fresh medium and grown for 2-3 h under permissive conditions to an OD600 of 0.2 to 0.4.Cultures were normalized by OD600 and then used to generate 10-fold serial dilutions in LB.Dilutions were spotted (5 µl) onto LB agar plates containing the indicated concentrations of IPTG or Larabinose using a multichannel pipette.Plates were incubated overnight at temperatures indicated and then imaged.
In vivo cysteine crosslinking.Overnight cultures were diluted 1:200 in fresh medium containing 50-100 µM IPTG (for expressing various cysteine-substituted ftsA genes from pDSW210) and grown to a final OD600 of 0.4 to 0.6 depending on the experiment.For the cell division synchronization experiment using the ftsZ84 mutant strains carrying pDSW210-FLAG-FtsA, FtsA Q155C ,FtsA S407C , or FtsA D123C , cultures were grown at 30˚C until an OD600 of 0.2, at which point they were shifted to a 42˚C shaking water bath for 45 min, then shifted back to 30˚C.Aliquots from 0-, 10-and 20-min time points at 30˚C were placed on ice and processed for crosslinking as described below.For the experiment with the ftsA o allele and ftsQ1 and zipA1 thermosensitive mutants, cultures were grown at 30˚C until an OD600 of 0.2, at which point they were shifted to a 42˚C shaking water bath for 45 min prior to harvesting for crosslinking.For the crosslinking experiment with WM4952 derivatives, cultures were all grown at 37˚C.Cultures were placed on ice then the equivalent of 1.0 OD600 of each was pelleted, washed with cold PBS, and resuspended in 50 µl cold PBS.BMB (1,4 bis-maleimidobutane) and BMH (bis-maleimidohexane) crosslinkers (ThermoFisher Inc.) or dBBR (dibromobimane) crosslinker (Sigma Aldrich) were prepared as 20 mM stock solutions in DMSO and added to each resuspended cell pellet to a final concentration of 0.5 mM.After 10 min of incubation, crosslinking was quenched by addition of 40 mM beta-mercaptoethanol (BME).Samples were pelleted and resuspended in 36.4 µl of freshly prepared resuspension buffer (50 mM Bis-Tris pH 7.0, 750 mM aminocaproic acid, 2 mg/ml lysozyme, 1 mM EDTA, 1.43 mM BME, 1x EDTA-free Pierce Protease Inhibitor [Thermo Scientific]) and incubated 20 min on ice.Dodecyl maltoside and SDS were each added to a final concentration of 0.9%, followed by an additional 20 min incubation on ice.Samples were then subjected to three cycles of 2-min incubation at 100˚C followed by 2 min on dry ice, then pelleted in a microcentrifuge for 30 min.Supernatant fractions (40 µl) were combined with 5X sample buffer (312 mM Tris pH 6.8, 10% SDS, 50% glycerol, 25% BME) and boiled for 3 min prior to SDS-PAGE.Wells were generally loaded with 5 µl, or the equivalent of 0.1 OD600 of the original cell culture.Samples were stored at -20˚C.
Immunoblot analysis.Samples were boiled for 3 min prior to separation by SDSpolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE).Samples were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using a Mini Trans-Blot apparatus (Bio-Rad) at 200 mA for 55 min in Towbin transfer buffer containing 0.1% SDS.Blots were stained by Ponceau staining to assess total protein levels, then blocked using 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in Tris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST) and incubated with 1:5000 rabbit anti-FtsA or mouse anti-FLAG (F1804, Sigma-Aldrich) antibodies.After washes, blots were incubated with 1:40,000 goat anti-rabbit-HRP or anti-mouse-HRP, developed with Bio-Rad Clarity ECL substrate and imaged using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc MP system.The blots were also stained with Ponceau S (ThermoFisher) to visualize the levels of loaded protein samples across lanes.Band intensities were quantitated using ImageJ (63).
Microscopy.Overnight cultures were generally diluted 1:200 in liquid media and grown to early or mid-logarithmic phase for imaging.Cells were either examined as wet mounts or mounted on agarose pads and imaged on an Olympus BX63 microscope equipped with a Hamamatsu C11440 ORCA-Spark digital complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera using cellSens software (Olympus).Images were analyzed using Fiji/ImageJ (63).further suppressed by R286W or G50E (detectable at 100 µM IPTG).When FtsA was depleted, FtsA M96E R153D and FtsA M96E R153D R286W strains were viable.However, when forced to be the sole functional FtsA, FtsA M96E R153D G50E did not support viability, suggesting that the G50E allele is synthetically sick when combined with ftsL*.C) Controlled expression of FtsA and variants from pSEB439/pSEB440 after depletion of native FtsA in WM4952.WM4952 (ftsL+) or WM4953 (ftsL*) cells carrying pSEB439 vector or expressing FtsA (pSEB440) or FtsA variants (pWM7215, pWM7496, pWM7522) were diluted and spotted onto agar plates and incubated at 30˚C to deplete native FtsA, with either no IPTG or 100 µM IPTG to induce expression of the FtsA variants from the plasmid.D) Top row: Micrographs of overnight cultures of WM4952 at 30˚C carrying pSEB440 derivatives as noted (+ 55 µM IPTG added to induce plasmidexpression of FtsA derivatives), indicating that FtsA M96E R153D cannot substitute for native FtsA.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Bottom row: same as top row except the strain background is the isogenic ftsL* strain WM4953, which allows FtsA M96E R153D and its derivatives to divide, although not completely normally.Scale bar, 10 µm.and 4572 were transduced with ∆zipA::kan P1 lysate and plated on LB Amp Kan plus concentrations of IPTG shown to express the various FtsAs from plasmids and incubated at 37˚C overnight prior to imaging the agar plates.To examine cell morphology, one ∆zipA::kan transductant from FtsA G50E or FtsA R286W was inoculated in broth and grown in LB Amp Kan broth supplemented with 50 µM IPTG until reaching an OD600 of ~0.5 (FtsA R286W ) or 0.1 (FtsA G50E , which was concentrated ~5x prior to viewing).Scale bar, 10 µm.rosslinkers for conjugation between sulfhydryl nd characterize protein structure (i.e., the same reactivity but differ in length, the protein oligomer or interaction can assist in thioether linkage (Figure 1), which cannot be eimides is very specific to sulfhydryls at pH is 1000 times slower than the reaction to ines, histidines or methionines.
tive sulfhydryl targets, but hydrolysis to a re 1).For this reason, dissolved reagents are e also can occur following conjugation, , left panel, row 2), and instead conferred weaker growth of FtsA-replete cells (Fig. 8A, top panels, row 2), indicating that excess WT FtsL is dominant negative.Overall, these data indicate that FtsA M96E R153D can support cell division when FtsL** is co-produced.The ability of ftsL* or ftsL** to allow cell division independently of FtsA DS filaments suggested that DS filaments normally function to activate FtsWI-mediated septum synthesis--a role that can be bypassed if ftsL* activates FtsWI instead.We therefore reasoned that a ftsW* superfission allele, which self-activates FtsWI, could also bypass the need for FtsA DS filaments.We cloned the strong ftsW* allele ftsW E289G (Park et al. 2020) into the IPTG-inducible pDSW210 plasmid and assayed its ability to rescue viability of cells expressing FtsA M96E R153D primers 2892 and 2893 to amplify the ftsL** gene and flanking sequences, and 2894 and 2895 to linearize the pBAD18 vector portion.To construct pDSW210-FtsW*, the entire E. coli ftsW open reading frame encoding the E289G residue change was synthesized by Twist Bioscience, Inc., and cloned into pDSW210 in frame with the ATG start codon in the vector by in vivo cloning using primers 2877 and 2878 to linearize pDSW210, and 2879 and 2880 as internal primers.The resulting plasmid expressed an N-terminally FLAG-tagged FtsW E289G under PTrc control.

Fig. 2 .
Fig. 2. In vivo crosslinking detects an increase in FtsA DS filaments as cell division progresses.(A) Diagram of three FtsA subunits within an antiparallel DS filament (Nierhaus et

Fig. 3 .
Fig. 3. DS filament formation depends on divisome assembly.Derivatives of plasmid pDSW210-Flag-FtsA Q155C were introduced into ftsQ1ts (WM7148), zipA1ts (WM7149) or combined with an ftsA o allele (WM7150), grown at 30˚C until early logarithmic phase, then split into 30˚C or 42˚C cultures for an additional hour prior to cysteine crosslinking before SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-FtsA.A portion of the Ponceau S-stained blot is shown below the

Fig. 7 .
Fig. 7. FtsA DS filaments are not required for divisome assembly or recruitment of FtsN.Strain WM7518 carries pSEB440-FtsA M96E R153D , expresses a GFP-FtsN fusion at the native ftsN chromosomal locus and harbors the ftsL* and ftsA o alleles introduced by P1 transduction.(A) Confirmation that normal viability of WM7518 requires IPTG-dependent expression of FtsA M96E R153D , indicating that it is driving cell division in the absence of native FtsA.(B) The GFP-FtsN fusion localizes to nearly all divisomes in cells relying on FtsA M96E R153D and ftsL* for division.Two representative fields of cells (DIC and fluorescence) are shown, highlighting GFP-FtsN