Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Fecundity selection theory: concepts and evidence

Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, John Hunt
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/015586
Daniel Pincheira-Donoso
University of Lincoln;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dpincheiradonoso@lincoln.ac.uk
John Hunt
University of Exeter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Fitness results from the optimal balance between survival, mating success and fecundity. The interactions between these three components of fitness vary importantly depending on the selective context, from positive covariation between them, to antagonistic pleiotropic relationships when fitness increases in one reduce fitness of others. Therefore, elucidating the routes through which selection shapes life history and phenotypic adaptations via these fitness components is of primary significance to understand ecological and evolutionary dynamics. However, while the fitness components mediated by natural (survival) and sexual (mating success) selection have extensively been debated from most possible perspectives, fecundity selection remains considerably less studied. Here, we review the theory, evidence and implications of fecundity selection as a driver of sex-specific adaptive evolution. Based on accumulating literature on the life-history, phenotypic and ecological aspects of fecundity, we (i) suggest that ‘fecundity’ is restricted to refer to brood size per reproductive episode, while ‘annual’ and ‘lifetime fecundity’ should not be used interchangeably with ‘fecundity’ as they represent different life history parameters; (ii) provide a generalized redefinition of fecundity selection that encompasses any traits that influence fecundity in any direction (from high to low) and in either sex; (iii) review the (macro)ecological basis of fecundity selection (e.g., ecological pressures that influence predictable spatial variation in fecundity); (iv) suggest that most ecological theories of fecundity selection should be tested in organisms other than birds; (v) argue that the longstanding fecundity selection hypothesis of female-biased sexual size dimorphism (SSD) has gained inconsistent support, that strong fecundity selection does not necessarily drive female-biased SSD, and that this form of SSD can be driven by other selective pressures; and (vi) discuss cases in which fecundity selection operates on males.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
  • Posted February 23, 2015.

Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fecundity selection theory: concepts and evidence
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
Share
Fecundity selection theory: concepts and evidence
Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, John Hunt
bioRxiv 015586; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/015586
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Fecundity selection theory: concepts and evidence
Daniel Pincheira-Donoso, John Hunt
bioRxiv 015586; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/015586

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (620)
  • Biochemistry (860)
  • Bioengineering (516)
  • Bioinformatics (4762)
  • Biophysics (1503)
  • Cancer Biology (1030)
  • Cell Biology (1448)
  • Clinical Trials (52)
  • Developmental Biology (974)
  • Ecology (1633)
  • Epidemiology (808)
  • Evolutionary Biology (3691)
  • Genetics (2514)
  • Genomics (3266)
  • Immunology (602)
  • Microbiology (2416)
  • Molecular Biology (895)
  • Neuroscience (6488)
  • Paleontology (42)
  • Pathology (124)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (220)
  • Physiology (287)
  • Plant Biology (893)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (247)
  • Synthetic Biology (386)
  • Systems Biology (1323)
  • Zoology (162)