Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Invasion and migration of self-limiting gene drives: a comparative analysis

View ORCID ProfileSumit Dhole, Michael R. Vella, Alun L. Lloyd, Fred Gould
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/159855
Sumit Dhole
North Carolina State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sumit Dhole
  • For correspondence: sumitdhole@gmail.com
Michael R. Vella
North Carolina State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alun L. Lloyd
North Carolina State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fred Gould
North Carolina State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data Supplements
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Recent advances in research on gene drives have produced genetic constructs that could theoretically spread a desired gene (payload) into all of the populations of a targeted species, with a single release in one place. This attribute has advantages, but also comes with risks and ethical concerns. There has been a call for research on gene drive systems that are spatially and/or temporally self-limiting. Here we use a population genetics model to compare the expected characteristics of three self-limiting gene drive systems: one-locus underdominance, two-locus underdominance, and daisy-chain drive. We find large differences between the self-limiting gene drives in the minimum number of engineered individuals that need to be released for successfully driving a payload into an isolated population. The daisy-chain system is the most efficient, requiring the smallest release, followed by the two-locus underdominance system. The one-locus underdominance system requires the largest releases for successful drive to occur. However, when the target population exchanges migrants with a non-target population, the gene drives requiring smaller releases suffer from higher risks of unintended spread. For payloads that incur relatively low fitness costs (up to 30%), a simple daisy-chain drive is practically incapable of remaining localized, even with migration rates as low as 1% per generation. The two-locus underdominance system can achieve localized spread under a broader range of migration rates and of payload fitness costs, while the one-locus underdominance system largely remains localized. We also find differences in the extent of population alteration and in the permanence of the alteration achieved by the three gene drives. The two-locus underdominance system does not always spread the payload to fixation, even after successful drive, while the daisy-chain system can, in some cases, achieve a temporally-limited spread of the payload. These differences could affect the suitability of each gene drive for specific applications. We ask all readers to recognize that this article has not yet been peer reviewed, and thus, the results shown herein have not yet been validated by researchers other than the authors. We suggest that any reference to or quotation of this article should be made with this recognition.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
  • Posted July 6, 2017.

Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Invasion and migration of self-limiting gene drives: a comparative analysis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
Share
Invasion and migration of self-limiting gene drives: a comparative analysis
Sumit Dhole, Michael R. Vella, Alun L. Lloyd, Fred Gould
bioRxiv 159855; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/159855
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Invasion and migration of self-limiting gene drives: a comparative analysis
Sumit Dhole, Michael R. Vella, Alun L. Lloyd, Fred Gould
bioRxiv 159855; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/159855

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Synthetic Biology
  • Bioengineering
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (546)
  • Biochemistry (751)
  • Bioengineering (450)
  • Bioinformatics (4368)
  • Biophysics (1333)
  • Cancer Biology (901)
  • Cell Biology (1270)
  • Clinical Trials (43)
  • Developmental Biology (853)
  • Ecology (1465)
  • Epidemiology (710)
  • Evolutionary Biology (3454)
  • Genetics (2340)
  • Genomics (3038)
  • Immunology (491)
  • Microbiology (1968)
  • Molecular Biology (764)
  • Neuroscience (5820)
  • Paleontology (36)
  • Pathology (110)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (186)
  • Physiology (241)
  • Plant Biology (812)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (226)
  • Synthetic Biology (353)
  • Systems Biology (1199)
  • Zoology (149)