Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

A global comparison of the nutritive values of forage plants grown in contrasting environments

Mark Lee
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/224808
Mark Lee
RBG Kew
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m.lee@kew.org
  • Abstract
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Forage plants are valuable because they maintain wild and domesticated herbivores, and sustain the delivery of meat, milk and other commodities. Forage plants contain different quantities of fibre, lignin, minerals and protein, and vary in the proportion of their tissue that can be digested by herbivores. These nutritive components are important determinants of consumer growth rates, reproductive success and behaviour. A dataset was compiled to quantify variation in forage plant nutritive values within- and between-plant species, and to assess variation between plant functional groups and bioclimatic zones. 1,255 geo-located records containing 3,774 measurements of nutritive values for 136 forage plant species grown in 30 countries were obtained from published articles. Spatial variability in forage nutritive values indicated that climate modified plant nutritive values. Forage plants grown in arid and equatorial regions generally contained less digestible material than those grown in temperate and tundra regions; containing more fibre and lignin, and less protein. These patterns may reveal why herbivore body sizes, digestion and migration strategies are different in warmer and drier regions. This dataset also revealed the capacity for variation in the nutrition provided by forage plants. The proportion of the plant tissue that was digestible ranged between species from 2-91%. The amount of fibre contained within plant material ranged by 23-90%, protein by 2-36%, lignin by 1-21% and minerals by 2-22%. Water contents also varied substantially; ranging from 3-89% of standing biomass. On average, grasses and tree foliage contained the most fibre, whilst herbaceous legumes contained the most protein and tree foliage contained the most lignin. However, there were individual species within each functional group that were highly nutritious. This dataset may be used to identify forage plant species with useful traits which can be cultivated to enhance livestock productivity and inform wild herbivore conservation strategies.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
  • Posted November 25, 2017.

Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A global comparison of the nutritive values of forage plants grown in contrasting environments
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
Share
A global comparison of the nutritive values of forage plants grown in contrasting environments
Mark Lee
bioRxiv 224808; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/224808
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A global comparison of the nutritive values of forage plants grown in contrasting environments
Mark Lee
bioRxiv 224808; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/224808

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Plant Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (620)
  • Biochemistry (860)
  • Bioengineering (516)
  • Bioinformatics (4762)
  • Biophysics (1503)
  • Cancer Biology (1030)
  • Cell Biology (1448)
  • Clinical Trials (52)
  • Developmental Biology (974)
  • Ecology (1633)
  • Epidemiology (808)
  • Evolutionary Biology (3691)
  • Genetics (2514)
  • Genomics (3266)
  • Immunology (602)
  • Microbiology (2416)
  • Molecular Biology (895)
  • Neuroscience (6488)
  • Paleontology (42)
  • Pathology (124)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (220)
  • Physiology (287)
  • Plant Biology (893)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (247)
  • Synthetic Biology (386)
  • Systems Biology (1323)
  • Zoology (162)