New Results
A survey on information sources used by academic researchers to evaluate scientific instruments
View ORCID ProfileCarsten Bergenholtz, View ORCID ProfileSamuel C. MacAulay, View ORCID ProfileChristos Kolympiris, View ORCID ProfileInge Seim
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/253799
Carsten Bergenholtz
1Department of Management, School of Business and Social Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Samuel C. MacAulay
2UTS Business School, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Christos Kolympiris
3School of Management, University of Bath, Bath, UK
Inge Seim
4School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
Article usage
Posted May 03, 2018.
A survey on information sources used by academic researchers to evaluate scientific instruments
Carsten Bergenholtz, Samuel C. MacAulay, Christos Kolympiris, Inge Seim
bioRxiv 253799; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/253799
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (11718)
- Bioengineering (8724)
- Bioinformatics (29132)
- Biophysics (14936)
- Cancer Biology (12051)
- Cell Biology (17360)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (9406)
- Ecology (14146)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (18269)
- Genetics (12223)
- Genomics (16768)
- Immunology (11844)
- Microbiology (28016)
- Molecular Biology (11560)
- Neuroscience (60822)
- Paleontology (450)
- Pathology (1864)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (3231)
- Physiology (4940)
- Plant Biology (10401)
- Synthetic Biology (2878)
- Systems Biology (7333)
- Zoology (1642)