Abstract
Understanding how animal groups form and function is a major goal in behavioural ecology. Both genetic relatedness and familiarity among group mates have been shown to be key mediators of group composition. However, disentangling the two in most species is challenging as the most familiar individuals are often the most related, and vice versa. In order to gain a complete understanding of how individual interactions shape group behaviour it is crucial to understand the role each of this social relationship factors plays individually. To this end, we manipulated the level of familiarity among groups of the naturally clonal, and genetically identical fish, the Amazon molly (Poecilia formosa) and monitored group behaviour in an open-field and when given the opportunity to forage. Contrary to our predictions, fish that were the most familiar with each other showed the highest levels of aggression. Additionally, fish that were less familiar with each other exhibited the highest group cohesion and took the longest to begin feeding, compared to the more familiar fish. These results suggest that familiarity may socially buffer individuals from the perception of risk in novel environments, such as is common in most behavioural tests designed to test group behaviour. Increases in aggression that are associated with increasing familiarity as shown here might be a mechanism by which fish maintain a fission-fusion society with important consequences for the patterns of associations in group living animals.