Skip to main content
bioRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
New Results

Adaptive evolution of sperm proteins depends on sperm competition in a pair of Lepidoptera

Andrew J. Mongue, Megan E. Hansen, Liuqi Gu, Clyde E. Sorenson, James R. Walters
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/404236
Andrew J. Mongue
University of Kansas;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ajmongue@gmail.com
Megan E. Hansen
University of Kansas;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liuqi Gu
University of Kansas;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clyde E. Sorenson
North Carolina State University
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James R. Walters
University of Kansas;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data Supplements
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Sperm are among the most variable cells in nature. Both within and between species, sperm display more diversity in form than one would expect of an ostensibly single-function cell. Morphologically, some of this variation within species has been demonstrated to be non-adaptive, but for many species that consistently produce multiple sperm morphs, the significance of variable sperm remains unknown. Here, we investigate the molecular evolution of dimorphic sperm in Lepidoptera, the butterflies and moths; males of this order produce both fertilizing eupyrene sperm and a secondary apyrene type that lacks DNA. Based on population genetic analyses in two species, the monandrous Carolina sphinx moth and the highly polyandrous monarch butterfly, we see evidence for increased selection in fertilizing sperm, but only in the polyandrous species. This signal comes primarily from a decrease in non-synonymous polymorphism in sperm proteins compared to the rest of the genome, indicative of strong purifying selection. Additionally, rates of non-synonymous divergence are comparable between sperm genes and the rest of the genome, suggesting that many alleles reach fixation owing to positive selection as well. Investigation of the distribution of fitness effects of new non-synonymous mutations in monarch sperm confirms stronger selection on sperm proteins in monarchs, with very few neutral variants and a preponderance of deleterious and beneficial variants. These results mirror findings on sperm evolution in other taxa; increased sperm competition decreases within-population morphological variation. Our results suggest that sperm competition can be a powerful selective force at the sequence level as well.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
  • Posted August 31, 2018.

Download PDF

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about bioRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Adaptive evolution of sperm proteins depends on sperm competition in a pair of Lepidoptera
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from bioRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the bioRxiv website.
Share
Adaptive evolution of sperm proteins depends on sperm competition in a pair of Lepidoptera
Andrew J. Mongue, Megan E. Hansen, Liuqi Gu, Clyde E. Sorenson, James R. Walters
bioRxiv 404236; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/404236
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Adaptive evolution of sperm proteins depends on sperm competition in a pair of Lepidoptera
Andrew J. Mongue, Megan E. Hansen, Liuqi Gu, Clyde E. Sorenson, James R. Walters
bioRxiv 404236; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/404236

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Evolutionary Biology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Animal Behavior and Cognition (814)
  • Biochemistry (1124)
  • Bioengineering (716)
  • Bioinformatics (5722)
  • Biophysics (1943)
  • Cancer Biology (1381)
  • Cell Biology (1957)
  • Clinical Trials (71)
  • Developmental Biology (1337)
  • Ecology (2048)
  • Epidemiology (1096)
  • Evolutionary Biology (4331)
  • Genetics (3042)
  • Genomics (3923)
  • Immunology (836)
  • Microbiology (3289)
  • Molecular Biology (1220)
  • Neuroscience (8382)
  • Paleontology (62)
  • Pathology (169)
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology (304)
  • Physiology (401)
  • Plant Biology (1138)
  • Scientific Communication and Education (318)
  • Synthetic Biology (469)
  • Systems Biology (1596)
  • Zoology (210)