New Results
The Case For and Against Double-blind Reviews
Amelia R. Cox, Robert Mongomerie
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/495465
Amelia R. Cox
1Biology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Robert Mongomerie
1Biology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Article usage
Posted December 16, 2018.
The Case For and Against Double-blind Reviews
Amelia R. Cox, Robert Mongomerie
bioRxiv 495465; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/495465
Subject Area
Subject Areas
- Biochemistry (11755)
- Bioengineering (8757)
- Bioinformatics (29209)
- Biophysics (14980)
- Cancer Biology (12103)
- Cell Biology (17416)
- Clinical Trials (138)
- Developmental Biology (9425)
- Ecology (14187)
- Epidemiology (2067)
- Evolutionary Biology (18314)
- Genetics (12246)
- Genomics (16807)
- Immunology (11870)
- Microbiology (28101)
- Molecular Biology (11599)
- Neuroscience (60995)
- Paleontology (452)
- Pathology (1872)
- Pharmacology and Toxicology (3238)
- Physiology (4961)
- Plant Biology (10429)
- Synthetic Biology (2887)
- Systems Biology (7341)
- Zoology (1651)