@article {Settell856989, author = {Megan L. Settell and Bruce E. Knudsen and Aaron M. Dingle and Andrea L. McConico and Evan N. Nicolai and James K. Trevathan and Erika K. Ross and Nicole A. Pelot and Warren M. Grill and Kenneth J. Gustafson and Andrew J. Shoffstall and Justin C. Williams and Weifeng Zeng and Samuel O. Poore and Luis C. Populin and Aaron J. Suminski and Kip A. Ludwig}, title = {Functional Vagotopy in the Cervical Vagus Nerve of the Domestic Pig: Implications for the Study of Vagus Nerve Stimulation}, elocation-id = {856989}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.1101/856989}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory}, abstract = {Given current clinical interest in vagus nerve stimulation, there are surprisingly few studies characterizing the anatomy of the vagus nerve in large animal models as it pertains to on-and off-target engagement of local fibers. We sought to address this gap by evaluating vagal anatomy in the domestic pig, whose vagus nerve organization and size approximates the human cervical vagus nerve. We provide data on key features across the cervical vagus nerve including diameter, number and diameter of fascicles, and distance of fascicles from the epineural surface where stimulating electrodes are placed. We also characterized the relative locations of the superior and recurrent laryngeal branches of the vagus nerve that have been implicated in therapy limiting side effects with common electrode placement. We identified key variants across the cohort that may be important for vagus nerve stimulation with respect to changing sympathetic/parasympathetic tone, such as cross-connections to the sympathetic trunk. We discovered that cell bodies of pseudo-unipolar cells aggregate together to form a very distinct grouping within the nodose ganglion. This distinct grouping gives rise to a larger number of smaller fascicles as one moves caudally down the cervical vagus nerve. This often leads to a distinct bimodal organization, or {\textquoteleft}vagotopy{\textquoteright} that may be advantageous to exploit in design of electrodes/stimulation paradigms. Finally, we placed our data in context of historic and recent histology spanning mouse, rat, canine, pig, non-human primate and human models, thus providing a comprehensive resource to understand similarities and differences across species.}, URL = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/12/29/856989}, eprint = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/12/29/856989.full.pdf}, journal = {bioRxiv} }