RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Bayesian Model Selection Maps for group studies using M/EEG data
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 365056
DO 10.1101/365056
A1 Clare D. Harris
A1 Elise G. Rowe
A1 Roshini Randeniya
A1 Marta I. Garrido
YR 2018
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/07/13/365056.abstract
AB Predictive coding postulates that we make (top-down) predictions about the world and that we continuously compare incoming (bottom-up) sensory information with these predictions, in order to update our models and perception so as to better reflect reality. That is, our so-called ‘Bayesian brains’ continuously create and update generative models of the world, inferring (hidden) causes from (sensory) consequences. Neuroimaging datasets enable the detailed investigation of such modelling and updating processes, and these datasets can themselves be analysed with Bayesian approaches. These offer methodological advantages over classical statistics. Specifically, any number of models can be compared, the models need not be nested, and the ‘null model’ can be accepted (rather than only failing to be rejected as in frequentist inference). This methodological paper explains how to construct posterior probability maps (PPMs) for Bayesian Model Selection (BMS) at the group level using electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. The method has only recently been used for EEG data, after originally being developed and applied in the context of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analysis. Here, we describe how this method can be adapted for EEG using the Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) software package for MATLAB. The method enables the comparison of an arbitrary number of hypotheses (or explanations for observed responses), at each and every voxel in the brain (source level) and/or in the scalp-time volume (scalp level), both within participants and at the group level. The method is illustrated here using mismatch negativity (MMN) data from a group of participants performing an audio-spatial oddball attention task. All data and code are provided in keeping with the Open Science movement. In so doing, we hope to enable others in the field of M/EEG to implement our methods so as to address their own questions of interest.