RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparative analysis based on transcriptomics and metabolomics data reveal differences between emmer and durum wheat in response to nitrogen starvation
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 2020.02.03.931717
DO 10.1101/2020.02.03.931717
A1 Romina Beleggia
A1 Nooshin Omranian
A1 Yan Holtz
A1 Tania Gioia
A1 Fabio Fiorani
A1 Franca M. Nigro
A1 Nicola Pecchioni
A1 Pasquale De Vita
A1 Urlich Schurr
A1 Jaques David
A1 Zoran Nikoloski
A1 Roberto Papa
YR 2020
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/02/04/2020.02.03.931717.abstract
AB Mounting evidence indicates the key role of Nitrogen (N) on diverse processes in plant, including not only yield but also development and defense. Using a combined transcriptomics and metabolomics approach, we studied the response of seedlings to N starvation of two different tetraploid wheat genotypes from the two main domesticated subspecies, emmer (Triticum turgidum ssp. dicoccum) and durum wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. durum). We found that durum wheat exhibits broader and stronger response in comparison to emmer as evidenced by the analysis of the differential expression pattern of both genes and metabolites and gene enrichment analysis. Emmer and durum wheat showed major differences in the responses to N starvation for transcription factor families. While emmer showed differential reduction in the levels of primary metabolites to N starvation, durum wheat exhibited increased levels of most metabolites, including GABA as an indicator of metabolic imbalance. The correlation-based networks including the differentially expressed genes and metabolites revealed tighter regulation of metabolism in durum wheat in comparison to emmer, as evidenced by the larger number of significant correlations. We also found that glutamate and GABA had highest values of centrality in the metabolic correlation network, suggesting their critical role in the genotype-specific response to N starvation of emmer and durum wheat, respectively. Moreover, this finding indicates that there might be contrasting strategies associated to GABA and Glutamate signaling modulating shoot vs root growth in the two different wheat subspecies.