PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Christopher J. Whyte
AU  - Amanda K. Robinson
AU  - Tijl Grootswagers
AU  - Hinze Hogendoorn
AU  - Thomas A. Carlson
TI  - Decoding Predictions and Violations of Object Position and Category in Time-resolved EEG
AID  - 10.1101/2020.04.08.032888
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 2020.04.08.032888
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/09/2020.04.08.032888.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/09/2020.04.08.032888.full
AB  - Classic models of predictive coding propose that sensory systems use information retained from prior experience to predict current sensory input. Any mismatch between predicted and current input (prediction error) is then fed forward up the hierarchy leading to a revision of the prediction. We tested this hypothesis in the domain of object vision using a combination of multivariate pattern analysis and time-resolved electroencephalography. We presented participants with sequences of images that stepped around fixation in a predictable order. On the majority of presentations, the images conformed to a consistent pattern of position order and object category order, however, on a subset of presentations the last image in the sequence violated the established pattern by either violating the predicted category or position of the object. Contrary to classic predictive coding when decoding position and category we found no differences in decoding accuracy between predictable and violation conditions. However, consistent with recent extensions of predictive coding, exploratory analyses showed that a greater proportion of predictions was made to the forthcoming position in the sequence than to either the previous position or the position behind the previous position suggesting that the visual system actively anticipates future input as opposed to just inferring current input.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.