RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Fussing about fission: defining variety among mainstream and exotic apicomplexan cell division modes
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 2020.04.23.056333
DO 10.1101/2020.04.23.056333
A1 Marc-Jan Gubbels
A1 Caroline D. Keroack
A1 Sriveny Dangoudoubiyam
A1 Hanna L. Worliczek
A1 Aditya S. Paul
A1 Ciara Bauwens
A1 Brendan Elsworth
A1 Klemens Engelberg
A1 Daniel K. Howe
A1 Isabelle Coppens
A1 Manoj T. Duraisingh
YR 2020
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/04/24/2020.04.23.056333.1.abstract
AB Cellular reproduction defines life, yet our textbook-level understanding of cell division is limited to a small number of model organisms centered around humans. The horizon on cell division variants is expanded here by advancing insights on the fascinating cell division modes found in the Apicomplexa, a key group of protozoan parasites. The Apicomplexa display remarkable variation in offspring number, whether karyokinesis follows each S/M-phase or not, and whether daughter cells bud in the cytoplasm or bud from the cortex. We find that the terminology used to describe the various manifestations of asexual apicomplexan cell division emphasizes either the number of offspring or site of budding, which are not directly comparable features and has led to confusion in the literature. Division modes have been primarily studied in two human pathogenic Apicomplexa, malaria-causing Plasmodium spp. and Toxoplasma gondii, a major cause of opportunistic infections. Plasmodium spp. divide asexually by schizogony, producing multiple daughters per division round through a cortical budding process, though at several life-cycle nuclear amplifications are not followed by karyokinesis. T. gondii divides by endodyogeny producing two internally budding daughters per division round. Here we add to this diversity in replication mechanisms by considering the cattle parasite Babesia bigemina and the pig parasite Cystoisospora suis. B. bigemina produces two daughters per division round by a ‘binary fission’ mechanism whereas C. suis produces daughters through both endodyogeny and multiple internal budding known as endopolygeny. In addition, we provide new data from the causative agent of equine protozoal myeloencephalitis (EPM), Sarcocystis neurona, which also undergoes endopolygeny but differs from C. suis by maintaining a single multiploid nucleus. Overall, we operationally define two principally different division modes: internal budding found in cyst-forming Coccidia (comprising endodyogeny and two forms of endopolygeny) and external budding found in the other parasites studied (comprising the two forms of schizogony, binary fission and multiple fission). Progressive insights into the principles defining the molecular and cellular requirements for internal versus external budding, as well as variations encountered in sexual stages are discussed. The evolutionary pressures and mechanisms underlying apicomplexan cell division diversification carries relevance across Eukaryota.Contribution to the Field Mechanisms of cell division vary dramatically across the Tree of Life, but the mechanistic basis has only been mapped for several model organisms. Here we present cell division strategies across Apicomplexa, a group of obligate intracellular parasites with significant impact on humans and domesticated animals. Asexual apicomplexan cell division is organized around assembly of daughter buds, but division forms differ in the cellular site of budding, number of offspring per division round, whether each S-phase follows karyokinesis and if mitotic rounds progress synchronously. This varies not just between parasites, but also between different life-cycle stages of a given species. We discuss the historical context of terminology describing division modes, which has led to confusion on how different modes relate to each other. Innovations in cell culture and genetics together with light microscopy advances have opened up cell biological studies that can shed light on this puzzle. We present new data for three division modes barely studied before. Together with existing data, we show how division modes are organized along phylogenetic lines and differentiate along external and internal budding mechanisms. We also discuss new insights into how the variations in division mode are regulated at the molecular level, and possess unique cell biological requirements.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.