RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Characterizing the body morphology of the first metacarpal in the Homininae using 3D geometric morphometrics
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 2020.04.30.070326
DO 10.1101/2020.04.30.070326
A1 Jonathan Morley
A1 Ana Bucchi
A1 Carlos Lorenzo
A1 Thomas A. Püschel
YR 2020
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/05/01/2020.04.30.070326.abstract
AB Objectives Extinct hominins can provide key insights into the development of tool use, with the morphological characteristics of the thumb of particular interest due to its fundamental role in enhanced manipulation. This study quantifies the shape of the first metacarpal’s body in the extant Homininae and some fossil hominins to provide insights about the possible anatomical correlates of manipulative capabilities.Materials and methods The extant sample includes MC1s of modern humans (n=42), gorillas (n=27) and chimpanzees (n=30), whilst the fossil sample included Homo neanderthalensis, Homo naledi and Australopithecus sediba. 3D geometric morphometrics were used to characterize the overall shape of MC1’s body.Results Humans differ significantly from extant great apes when comparing overall shape. H. neanderthalensis mostly falls within the modern human range of variation although also showing a more robust morphology. H. naledi varies from modern human slightly, whereas A. sediba varies from humans to an even greater extent. When classified using a linear discriminant analysis, the three fossils are categorized within the Homo group.Discussion The results are in general agreement with previous studies on the morphology of the MC1. This study found that the modern human MC1 is characterized by a distinct suite of traits, not present to the same extent in the great apes, that are consistent with an ability to use forceful precision grip. This morphology was also found to align very closely with that of H. neanderthalensis. H. naledi shows a number of human-like adaptations consistent with an ability to employ enhanced manipulation, whilst A. sediba apparently presents a mix of both derived and more primitive traits.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.