PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - T. Scott Murdison
AU  - Guillaume Leclercq
AU  - Philippe Lefèvre
AU  - Gunnar Blohm
TI  - Mis-perception of motion in depth originates from an incomplete transformation of retinal signals
AID  - 10.1101/443218
DP  - 2018 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 443218
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/10/14/443218.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/10/14/443218.full
AB  - Depth perception requires the use of an internal model of the eye-head geometry to infer distance from binocular retinal images and extraretinal 3D eye-head information, particularly ocular vergence. Similarly for motion in depth perception, gaze angle is required to correctly interpret the spatial direction of motion from retinal images; however, it is unknown whether the brain can make adequate use of extraretinal version and vergence information to correctly interpret binocular retinal motion for spatial motion in depth perception. Here, we tested this by asking participants to reproduce the perceived spatial trajectory of an isolated point stimulus moving on different horizontal-depth paths either peri-foveally or peripherally while participants’ gaze was oriented at different vergence and version angles. We found large systematic errors in the perceived motion trajectory that reflected an intermediate reference frame between a purely retinal interpretation of binocular retinal motion (ignoring vergence and version) and the spatially correct motion. A simple geometric model could capture the behavior well, revealing that participants tended to underestimate their version by as much as 17%, overestimate their vergence by as much as 22%, and underestimate the overall change in retinal disparity by as much as 64%. Since such large perceptual errors are not observed in everyday viewing, we suggest that other monocular and/or contextual cues are required for accurate real-world motion in depth perception.