PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Morgan L. Cox AU - Zhi-De Deng AU - Hannah Palmer AU - Amanda Watts AU - Lysianne Beynel AU - Jonathan R. Young AU - Sarah H. Lisanby AU - John Migaly AU - Lawrence G. Appelbaum TI - Utilizing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhance Laparoscopic Technical Skills Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial AID - 10.1101/455329 DP - 2018 Jan 01 TA - bioRxiv PG - 455329 4099 - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/10/30/455329.short 4100 - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/10/30/455329.full AB - This study aimed to test the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) during laparoscopic skill training to determine if it has the capacity to accelerate technical skill acquisition. tDCS is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that delivers constant, low electrical current resulting in changes to cortical excitability and prior work suggests it may enhance motor learning. We evaluate for the first time the potential of tDCS, coupled with motor skill training, to accelerate the development of laparoscopic technical skills. In this pre-registered, double-blinded and sham-controlled study, 60 healthy subjects were randomized into sham or active tDCS in either bilateral primary motor cortex (bM1) or supplementary motor area (SMA) electrode configurations. All subjects practiced the Fundamental of Laparoscopic Surgery Peg Transfer Task during a pre-test, six 20-minute training sessions, and a post-test. The primary outcome was change in laparoscopic skill performance over time, quantified by improvement in performance according to a seconds-per-object calculated score accounting for errors. Sixty participants were randomized equally into the three training cohorts (active bM1, active SMA, sham). The active groups had significantly greater improvement in performance from pre-test to post-test compared to the sham groups (108 vs 76 seconds, p = 0.018). Both bM1 and SMA active cohorts had significantly greater improvement in learning (p < 0.01), achieving the same skill level in 4 sessions compared to the 6 sessions required of the sham cohort. The SMA cohort had more variability in performance compared to the bM1 and control cohorts. Laparoscopic skill training with active, bM1 or SMA, tDCS exhibited significantly greater learning relative to training with sham tDCS. The potential for tDCS to enhance the training of surgical skills merits further investigation to determine if these preliminary results may be replicated.