PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - André M. de Roos
TI  - Dynamic population stage-structure stabilizes complex ecological communities
AID  - 10.1101/2020.06.27.174755
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 2020.06.27.174755
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/29/2020.06.27.174755.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/06/29/2020.06.27.174755.full
AB  - Natural ecological communities are diverse, complex and often surprisingly stable, but the mechanisms underlying their stability remain a theoretical enigma1-5. Interactions such as competition and predation presumably structure communities6, yet theory predicts that complex communities are only stable when species growth rates are mostly limited by intraspecific self-regulation rather than by interactions with resources, competitors and predators3,5,7. Current theory, however, only considers the network topology of population-level interactions between species and neglects within-population differences among juvenile and adult individuals. Here, using model simulations, I show that including commonly observed differences in vulnerability to predation and foraging efficiency between juvenile and adult individuals results in up to ten times larger, more complex communities than in simulations without population stage-structure. These diverse communities are stable or fluctuate with limited amplitude, even though in the model only a single basal species is self-regulated and the population-level interaction network is highly connected. Analysis of the species interaction matrix predicts the simulated communities to be unstable but extending the matrix with a population structure subsystem reveals that dynamic changes in population stage-structure completely cancel out this instability. Common differences between juveniles and adults and fluctuations in their relative abundance hence have a decisive influence on the stability of complex natural communities and their vulnerability when environmental conditions change. Thus, community persistence can not be explained by the network of interactions between the constituting species alone.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.