RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Naproxen impairs load-induced bone formation, reduces bone toughness, and delays stress fracture repair in mice JF bioRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory SP 427138 DO 10.1101/427138 A1 Jino Park A1 Andrzej Fertala A1 Ryan E. Tomlinson YR 2018 UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2018/11/09/427138.abstract AB Debilitating stress fractures are surprisingly common in physically active individuals, including athletes, military recruits, and dancers. These individuals are overrepresented in the 30 million daily users of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). We hypothesized that regular use of NSAIDs would predispose habitually loaded bones to stress fracture and delay the repair of these injuries. To test this hypothesis, adult mice were subjected to six bouts of axial forelimb compression over two weeks. Aspirin, naproxen, or vehicle was administered 24 hours before loading. Naproxen-treated mice had diminished load-induced bone formation as well as a significant loss in toughness in non-loaded bone, which were not observed in aspirin-treated mice. Furthermore, there were no differences in RANKL/OPG ratio or cortical bone parameters. Picrosirius red staining and second harmonic generation imaging revealed that alterations in bone collagen fibril size and organization were driving the loss of toughness in naproxen-treated mice. Separately, adult mice were subjected to an ulnar stress fracture generated by a single bout of fatigue loading, with NSAIDs provided 24 hours before injury. Both aspirin-treated and naproxen-treated mice had normal forelimb use in the week after injury, whereas control mice favored the injured forelimb until day 7. However, woven bone volume was only significantly impaired by naproxen. Both NSAIDs were found to significantly inhibit Cox2 and Ngf expression following stress fracture, but only naproxen significantly affected serum PGE2 concentration. Overall, our results suggest that naproxen, but not aspirin, may increase the risk of stress fracture and extend the healing time of these injuries, warranting further clinical evaluation for patients at risk for fatigue injuries.