PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Elkin A. Tenorio
AU  - Paola Montoya
AU  - Natalia Norden
AU  - Susana Rodríguez-Buriticá
AU  - Beatriz Salgado-Negret
AU  - Mailyn A. Gonzalez
TI  - The contribution of global mountains to the latitudinal diversity gradient
AID  - 10.1101/2020.07.04.188227
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 2020.07.04.188227
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/06/2020.07.04.188227.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/06/2020.07.04.188227.full
AB  - The latitudinal diversity gradient (LDG) is widely attributed to be the result of factors such as time, area, and energy. Although these factors explain most of the variation in lowlands, they fail in mountainous systems, which are biodiversity hotspots that may contribute meaningfully to the strength of the pattern following different evolutionary pathways. However, because lowlands cover the largest portion of the total land, they may have overshadowed the contribution of mountains to the LDG, but no study has addressed this issue in previous macroecological analyses. Here, we propose that the LDG shows a stronger trend in mountain ranges due to their high species turnover, in spite of covering less than one third of the Earth’s land. Using the geographical information for ∼22000 species of terrestrial vertebrates, we show that worldwide mountains harbor the 40% of the global diversity, and when taking into account the area effect, we quantified that mountains harbor close to double the species inhabiting lowlands per unit area. Moreover, when we evaluated the LDG after accounting for area size, we found that species richness increased faster towards the Equator and was better predicted by latitude in mountains than in lowlands. Our findings challenge previously well-supported hypotheses that predict that those regions with greater area, time and energy accumulate more species richness, since mountains are geologically younger, exhibit less energy, and cover smaller areas than lowlands. Hence, mountains represent a paradox, which invites to reevaluate hypotheses regarding macroecological and evolutionary processes driving species diversity gradients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.