RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Upper extremity exomuscle for shoulder abduction support
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 2020.04.25.061846
DO 10.1101/2020.04.25.061846
A1 Cole Simpson
A1 Bryce Huerta
A1 Sean Sketch
A1 Maarten Lansberg
A1 Elliot Hawkes
A1 Allison Okamura
YR 2020
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/13/2020.04.25.061846.abstract
AB Assistive devices may aid motor recovery after a stroke, but access to such devices is limited. Exosuits can aid human movement and may be more accessible alternatives to current devices, but we know little about how they might assist post-stroke upper extremity movement. Here, we designed an exosuit actuator to support shoulder abduction, which we call an “exomuscle” and is based on a form of growing robot called a pneumatic-reel actuator. We also assembled a ceiling-mounted support for a positive control. We verified that both supports reduce the activity of shoulder abductor muscles and do not impede range of motion in healthy participants (n=4). Then, we measured reachable workspace area in stroke survivors (n=6) with both supports and without support. Our exomuscle increased workspace area in four participants (180±90 cm2) while the ceiling support increased workspace area in five participants (792±540 cm2). Design decisions that reduce exomuscle complexity, such as leaving the forearm free, likely contribute to performance differences between the two supports. Heterogeneity amongst stroke survivors’ abilities likely contribute to high variability in our results. Though both supports performed similarly for healthy participants, performance differences in stroke survivors highlight the need to validate assistive devices in the target population.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.