RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 How important is CRISPR-Cas for protecting natural populations of bacteria against infections by mobile genetic elements? JF bioRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory SP 2020.02.05.935965 DO 10.1101/2020.02.05.935965 A1 Edze Westra A1 Bruce Levin YR 2020 UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/07/25/2020.02.05.935965.abstract AB Articles on CRISPR commonly open with some variant of the phrase ‘these short-palindromic repeats and their associated endonucleases (Cas) are an adaptive immune system that exists to protect bacteria and archaea from viruses and infections with other mobile genetic elements’. There is an abundance of genomic data consistent with the hypothesis that CRISPR plays this role in natural populations of bacteria and archaea, and experimental demonstrations with a few species of bacteria and their phage and plasmids show that CRISPR-Cas systems can play this role in vitro. Not at all clear are the ubiquity, magnitude and nature of the contribution of CRISPR-Cas systems to the ecology and evolution of natural populations of microbes, and the strength of selection mediated by different types of phage and plasmids to the evolution and maintenance of CRISPR-Cas systems. In this perspective, with the aid of heuristic mathematical-computer simulation models, we explore the a priori conditions under which exposure to lytic and temperate phage and conjugative plasmids will select for and maintain CRISPR-Cas systems in populations of bacteria and archaea. We review the existing literature addressing these ecological and evolutionary questions and highlight the experimental and other evidence needed to fully understand the conditions responsible for the evolution and maintenance of CRISPR-Cas systems and the contribution of these systems to the ecology and evolution of bacteria, archaea and the mobile genetic elements that infect them.Significance There is no question about the importance and utility of CRISPR-Cas for editing and modifying genomes. On the other hand, the mechanisms responsible for the evolution and maintenance of these systems and the magnitude of their importance to the ecology and evolution of bacteria, archaea and their infectious DNAs, are not at all clear. With the aid of heuristic mathematical – computer simulation models and reviews of the existing literature, we raise questions that have to be answered to elucidate the contribution of selection – mediated by phage and plasmids – to the evolution and maintenance of this adaptive immune system and its consequences for the ecology and evolution of prokaryotes and their viruses and plasmids.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.