TY - JOUR T1 - Computational verification of large logical models – application to the prediction of T cell response to checkpoint inhibitors JF - bioRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.05.01.073379 SP - 2020.05.01.073379 AU - Céline Hernandez AU - Morgane Thomas-Chollier AU - Aurélien Naldi AU - Denis Thieffry Y1 - 2020/01/01 UR - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/08/18/2020.05.01.073379.abstract N2 - At the crossroad between biology and mathematical modelling, computational systems biology can contribute to a mechanistic understanding of high-level biological phenomenon. But as knowledge accumulates, the size and complexity of mathematical models increase, calling for the development of efficient dynamical analysis methods. Here, we propose the use of two approaches for the development and analysis of complex cellular network models.A first approach, called “model verification” and inspired by unitary testing in software development, enables the formalisation and automated verification of validation criteria for whole models or selected sub-parts. When combined with efficient analysis methods, this approach is suitable for continuous testing, thereby greatly facilitating model development.A second approach, called “value propagation”, enables efficient analytical computation of the impact of specific environmental or genetic conditions on the dynamical behaviour of some models.We apply these two approaches to the delineation and the analysis of a comprehensive model for T cell activation, taking into account CTLA4 and PD-1 checkpoint inhibitory pathways. While model verification greatly eases the delineation of logical rules complying with a set of dynamical specifications, propagation provides interesting insights into the different potential of CTLA4 and PD-1 immunotherapies.Both methods are implemented and made available in the all-inclusive CoLoMoTo Docker image, while the different steps of the model analysis are fully reported in two companion interactive jupyter notebooks, thereby ensuring the reproduction of our results.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest. ER -