RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Automated pupillometry to detect command following in neurological patients: A proof-of-concept study
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 525212
DO 10.1101/525212
A1 Vassilieva, Alexandra
A1 Olsen, Markus Harboe
A1 Peinkhofer, Costanza
A1 Knudsen, Gitte Moos
A1 Kondziella, Daniel
YR 2019
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/01/21/525212.abstract
AB Background Levels of consciousness in patients with acute and chronic brain injury are notoriously underestimated. Paradigms based on electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) may detect covert consciousness in unresponsive patients but are subject to logistical challenges and the need for advanced statistical analysis.Methods To assess the feasibility of automated pupillometry for the detection of command following, we enrolled 20 healthy volunteers and 48 patients with a wide range of neurological disorders, including 7 patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), who were asked to engage in mental arithmetic.Results Fourteen of 20 (70%) healthy volunteers and 17 of 43 (39.5%) neurological patients, including 1 in the ICU, fulfilled prespecified criteria for command following by showing pupillary dilations during ≥4 of 5 arithmetic tasks. None of the 5 sedated and unconscious ICU patients passed this threshold.Conclusions Automated pupillometry combined with mental arithmetic appears to be a promising paradigm for the detection of covert consciousness in people with brain injury. We plan to build on this study by focusing on non-communicating ICU patients in whom the level of consciousness is unknown. If some of these patients show reproducible pupillary dilation during mental arithmetic, this would suggest that the present paradigm can reveal conscious awareness in unresponsive patients in whom standard investigations have failed to detect signs of covert consciousness.Author contributionAV, MHO, CP: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, critical revision for important intellectual content, approval of final manuscript; GMK: critical revision for important intellectual content, approval of final manuscript; DK: study concept, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, writing of the manuscript, critical revision for important intellectual content, approval of final manuscript