PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Pedro Gonçalves Vaz
AU  - Eric C. Merten
AU  - Christopher T. Robinson
AU  - Paulo Pinto
TI  - Heavily burned wood from wildfires is less likely to provide substrate for stream biota
AID  - 10.1101/2020.10.25.354217
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 2020.10.25.354217
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/25/2020.10.25.354217.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/25/2020.10.25.354217.full
AB  - Increasingly severe forest fires are recruiting more heavily burned wood into streams. Wood affects every ecological and physical process in streams differently throughout seasons. However, little is known about the seasonality of wood functions in fire-prone biomes and how it combines with wood burning level to guide future postfire restoration efforts.Through an extensive three-year seasonal tracking of stream wood following forest fires in central Portugal, we examined for the first time the influence of burning level, season, and a large suite of driving factors on the likelihood of each of four functions with primary ecological consequences — retention of organic matter, serving as substrate for aquatic biota, being key pieces forming wood jams, and deflecting flow including pool habitat formation.Our results strongly support that one of the main ecological functions of wood in rivers, i.e. to provide substrate for biological organisms — namely for vegetation, periphyton, biofilms, and ovipositions — can be negatively affected in heavily burned wood.Except for jam formation, the probability of each stream wood function changed markedly with season and the probability of non-function was nearly twice as high in the Euro-Mediterranean dry as in the wet season.More anchored and decayed wood increased the probability of all functions, whereas the effect of submergence depended on the function. Challenging the “size paradigm” assuming larger-sized pieces to provide more function, our data suggest the effect of size to be function-specific.Synthesis and applications. We show how postfire restoration success can be maximized by selecting the most appropriate wood, taking advantage of attribute-function relationships and choosing the right timing for operations. We urge managers to refrain from removing wood or to selectively remove the most heavily carbonized only, allowing the persistence of great potential to provide substrate for stream biota. The non-attraction of heavily burned wood as substrate can be compensated for by other wood with attributes enhancing this function, such as wood deeper within the bankfull area, and with large diameters. These results help to inform successful management, as is increasingly asked from restoration ecology.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.