@article {van Baar2020.10.28.358051, author = {Jeroen M. van Baar and David J. Halpern and Oriel FeldmanHall}, title = {Intolerance to uncertainty modulates neural synchrony between political partisans}, elocation-id = {2020.10.28.358051}, year = {2020}, doi = {10.1101/2020.10.28.358051}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory}, abstract = {Political partisans see the world through an ideologically biased lens. What drives political polarization? It has been posited that polarization arises because holding extreme political views satisfies a need for certain and stable beliefs about the world. We examined the relationship between uncertainty tolerance and political polarization using brain-to-brain synchrony analysis, which measured committed liberals{\textquoteright} and conservatives{\textquoteright} subjective interpretation of a continuous political narrative. Participants (N=44) watched a political debate while undergoing fMRI. Shared ideology between participants increased neural synchrony in many brain areas including key regions of the valuation and theory-of-mind networks (e.g. temporoparietal junction). The degree of neural synchrony was modulated by uncertainty aversion: Uncertainty-intolerant individuals experienced greater brain-to-brain synchrony with politically like-minded peers and lower synchrony with political opponents. This effect was observed for liberals and conservatives alike. Moreover, increasing neural synchrony between committed partisans predicted subsequent polarized attitude formation about the debate after the scanning session. These results suggest that uncertainty attitudes gate the shared neural processing of political narratives, thereby fueling polarized attitude formation about hot-button issues.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.}, URL = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/29/2020.10.28.358051}, eprint = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/10/29/2020.10.28.358051.full.pdf}, journal = {bioRxiv} }