PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Alana Pindar
AU  - Adam Hogg
AU  - Nigel E. Raine
TI  - Safeguarding pollinators requires specific habitat prescriptions and substantially more land area than current policy suggests
AID  - 10.1101/2020.12.14.422715
DP  - 2020 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 2020.12.14.422715
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/15/2020.12.14.422715.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2020/12/15/2020.12.14.422715.full
AB  - Habitat loss and fragmentation are major drivers of global pollinator declines, yet even after recent unprecedented periods of anthropogenic land-use intensification the amount of habitat needed to support pollinators remains unknown. Here we use comprehensive datasets to determine the extent and amount of habitat needed. Safeguarding wild bee communities in a Canadian landscape requires 11.6-16.7% land-cover from a diverse range of habitats (~1.8-3.6x current policy guidelines), irrespective of whether conservation aims are enhancing species richness or abundance. Sensitive habitats, like tallgrass woodlands and wetlands, were important predictors of bee biodiversity. Conservation strategies that under-estimate the extent of habitat, spatial scale and specific habitat needs of functional guilds are unlikely to protect bee communities and the essential pollination services they provide to crops and wild plants.One sentence summary Safeguarding wild bee communities requires 11.6-16.7% of the area in common North American landscapes to provide targeted habitat prescriptions for different functional guilds over a variety of spatial scales.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.