TY - JOUR T1 - Promises and pitfalls of Topological Data Analysis for brain connectivity analysis JF - bioRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.02.10.430469 SP - 2021.02.10.430469 AU - Luigi Caputi AU - Anna Pidnebesna AU - Jaroslav Hlinka Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/11/2021.02.10.430469.abstract N2 - Developing sensitive and reliable methods to distinguish normal and abnormal brain states is a key neuroscientific challenge. Topological Data Analysis, despite its relative novelty, already generated many promising applications, including in neuroscience. We conjecture its prominent tool of persistent homology may benefit from going beyond analysing structural and functional connectivity to effective connectivity graphs capturing the direct causal interactions or information flows. Therefore, we assess the potential of persistent homology to directed brain network analysis by testing its discriminatory power in two enigmatic examples of disease-related brain connectivity alterations: epilepsy and schizophrenia. We estimate connectivity from functional magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiology data, employ Persistent Homology and quantify its ability to distinguish healthy from diseased brain states by applying a support vector machine to features quantifying persistent homology structure.We show how this novel approach compares to classification using standard undirected approaches and original connectivity matrices. In the schizophrenia classification, topological data analysis generally performs close to random, while classifications from raw connectivity perform substantially better; likely due to topographical, rather than topological, specificity of the differences. In seizure discrimination from scalp electroencephalography data, classification based on directed persistent homology features provided comparable results to other methods, reaching 89 percent accuracy. Specific niche for topological data analysis opens when direct comparison of connectivity matrices is unsuitable - such as for intracranial electrophysiology with individual number and location of measurements. While standard homology performed overall better than directed homology, this could be due to notorious technical problems of accurate effective connectivity estimation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest. ER -