PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Ryan Feehan
AU  - Meghan W. Franklin
AU  - Joanna S.G. Slusky
TI  - Machine Learning Differentiates Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Metals in Proteins
AID  - 10.1101/2021.02.01.429261
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 2021.02.01.429261
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/22/2021.02.01.429261.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/22/2021.02.01.429261.full
AB  - Metalloenzymes are 40% of all enzymes and can perform all seven classes of enzyme reactions. Because of the physicochemical similarities between the active sites of metalloenzymes and inactive metal binding sites, it is challenging to differentiate between them. Yet distinguishing these two classes is critical for the identification of both native and designed enzymes. Because of similarities between these two types of metal binding sites, finding physicochemical features that distinguish active and inactive metal sites can indicate aspects that are critical to enzyme function. In this work, we develop the largest structural dataset of enzymatic and non-enzymatic metalloprotein sites to date. We then use a decision-tree ensemble machine learning model to classify metals bound to proteins as enzymatic or non-enzymatic with 92.2% precision and 90.1% recall. Our model scores electrostatic and pocket lining features as more important than pocket volume, despite the fact that volume is the most quantitatively different feature between enzyme and non-enzymatic sites. Finally, we find our model has overall better performance in a side-to-side comparison against other methods that differentiate enzymatic from non-enzymatic sequences. We anticipate that our model’s ability to correctly identify which metal sites are responsible for enzymatic activity could enable identification of new enzymatic mechanisms and de novo enzyme design.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.