RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 An enhanced Bouma model fits a hundred people’s visual crowding JF bioRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory SP 2021.04.12.439570 DO 10.1101/2021.04.12.439570 A1 Jan W. Kurzawski A1 Augustin Burchell A1 Darshan Thapa A1 Najib J. Majaj A1 Jonathan A. Winawer A1 Denis G. Pelli YR 2021 UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/14/2021.04.12.439570.abstract AB Crowding is the failure to recognize an object due to surrounding clutter. Its strength varies across the visual field and individuals. To characterize the statistics of crowding—ultimately to relate psychophysics of crowding to physiology—we measured radial crowding distance and acuity of 105 observers along the four cardinal meridians of the visual field. Fitting the well-known Bouma law — crowding distance depends linearly on radial eccentricity — explains 52% of the variance in log crowding distance, cross-validated. Our enhanced Bourma model, with factors for observer, meridian, and target kind, explains 72% of the variance, again cross-validated. The meridional factors confirm previously reported asymmetries. We find a 0.62 horizontal:vertical advantage, a 0.92 lower:upper advantage, and a 0.82 right:left advantage. Crowding distance and acuity have a correlation of 0.41 at the fovea, which drops to 0.23 at ±5 deg along the horizontal midline. Acuity and crowding represent the size and spacing limits of perception. Since they are dissociated in clinical populations (Song et al., 2014; Strappini et al., 2017) and shown here to be only moderately correlated in our sample of mostly university students, clinical testing to predict real-world performance should consider measuring both. In sum, enhancing the Bouma law with terms for meridian, observer, and target kind provides an excellent fit to our 105-person survey of crowding.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.