PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Kyle W. Bender AU - Daniel Couto AU - Yasuhiro Kadota AU - Alberto P. Macho AU - Jan Sklenar AU - Marta Bjornson AU - Annalise Petriello AU - Maria Font Farre AU - Benjamin Schwessinger AU - Vardis Ntoukakis AU - Lena Stransfeld AU - Alexandra M.E. Jones AU - Frank L.H. Menke AU - Cyril Zipfel TI - ACTIVATION LOOP PHOSPHORYLATION OF A NON-RD RECEPTOR KINASE INITIATES PLANT INNATE IMMUNE SIGNALING AID - 10.1101/2021.05.01.442257 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - bioRxiv PG - 2021.05.01.442257 4099 - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/01/2021.05.01.442257.short 4100 - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/01/2021.05.01.442257.full AB - Receptor kinases (RKs) play fundamental roles in extracellular sensing to regulate development and stress responses across kingdoms. In plants, leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases (LRR-RKs) function primarily as peptide receptors that regulate myriad aspects of plant development and response to external stimuli. Extensive phosphorylation of LRR-RK cytoplasmic domains is among the earliest detectable responses following ligand perception, and reciprocal transphosphorylation between a receptor and its co-receptor is thought to activate the receptor complex. Originally proposed based on characterization of the brassinosteroid receptor, the prevalence of complex activation via reciprocal transphosphorylation across the plant RK family has not been tested. Using the LRR-RK ELONGATION FACTOR TU RECEPTOR (EFR) as a model RK, we set out to understand the steps critical for activating RK complexes. While the EFR cytoplasmic domain is an active protein kinase in vitro and is phosphorylated in a ligand-dependent manner in vivo, catalytically deficient EFR variants are functional in anti-bacterial immunity. These results reveal a non-catalytic role for the EFR cytoplasmic domain in triggering immune signaling and indicate that reciprocal transphoshorylation is not a ubiquitous requirement for LRR-RK complex activation. Rather, our analysis of EFR along with a detailed survey of the literature suggests a distinction between LRR-RK complexes with RD- versus non-RD protein kinase domains. Based on newly identified phosphorylation sites that regulate the activation state of the EFR complex in vivo, we propose that LRR-RK complexes containing a non-RD protein kinase may be regulated by phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes of the ligand-binding receptor which could initiate signaling in a feed-forward fashion either allosterically or through driving the dissociation of negative regulators of the complex.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.