TY - JOUR T1 - Phonological and temporal regularities lead to differential ERP effects in self- and externally generated speech JF - bioRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.05.04.442414 SP - 2021.05.04.442414 AU - Alexandra K. Emmendorfer AU - Milene Bonte AU - Bernadette M. Jansma AU - Sonja A. Kotz Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/04/2021.05.04.442414.abstract N2 - Some theories of predictive processing propose reduced sensory and neural responses to anticipated events. Support comes from M/EEG studies, showing reduced auditory N1 and P2 responses to self-compared to externally generated events, or when stimulus properties are more predictable (e.g. prototypical). The current study examined the sensitivity of N1 and P2 responses to statistical regularities of speech. We employed a motor-to-auditory paradigm comparing ERP responses to externally and self-generated pseudowords, varying in phonotactic probability and syllable stress. We expected to see N1 and P2 suppression for self-generated stimuli, with greater suppression effect for more predictable features such as high phonotactic probability and first syllable stress in pseudowords. We observe an interaction between phonotactic probability and condition on the N1 amplitude, with an enhanced effect of phonotactic probability in processing self-generated stimuli. However, the directionality of this effect was reversed compared to what was expected, namely a larger N1 amplitude for high probability items, possibly indicating a perceptual bias toward the more predictable item. We further observed an effect of syllable stress on the P2 amplitude, with greater amplitudes in response to first syllable stress items. The current results suggest that phonotactic probability plays an important role in processing self-generated speech, supporting feedforward models involved in speech production.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.AbbreviationsAOauditory-only,BOLDblood oxygenation level dependent,Condcondition,ERPevent-related potential,fMRIfunctional magnetic resonance imaging,HPPhigh phonotactic probability,ICAindependent component analysis,IQRinter-quartile range,LPPlow phonotactic probability,MAmotor-auditory,MACmotor-auditory corrected,M/EEGmagneto-/electroencephalography,MISmotor-induced suppression,MOmotor-only,PhonProbphonotactic probability,ROIregion of interest,SylStrsyllable stress,SylS1first syllable stress,SylS2second syllable stress. ER -