PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Jonathan S. Tsay
AU  - Adrian M. Haith
AU  - Richard B. Ivry
AU  - Hyosub E. Kim
TI  - Distinct Processing of Sensory Prediction Error and Task Error during Motor Learning
AID  - 10.1101/2021.06.20.449180
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 2021.06.20.449180
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/20/2021.06.20.449180.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/20/2021.06.20.449180.full
AB  - While sensory-prediction error (SPE), the difference between predicted and actual sensory feedback, is recognized as the primary signal that drives implicit motor recalibration, recent studies have shown that task error (TE), the difference between sensory feedback and the movement goal, also plays a modulatory role. To systematically examine how SPE and TE collectively shape implicit recalibration, we performed a series of visuomotor learning experiments, introducing perturbations that varied the size of TE using a popular target displacement method and the size of SPE using a clamped visual feedback method. In Experiments 1 – 2, we observed robust sign-dependent changes in hand angle in response to perturbations with both SPE and TE but failed to observe changes in hand angle in response to TE-only perturbations. Yet in Experiments 3 – 4, the magnitude of TE modulated implicit recalibration in the presence of a fixed SPE. Taken together, these results underscore that implicit recalibration is driven by both SPE and TE (Kim, Parvin, & Ivry, 2019), while specifying unappreciated interactions between these two error-based processes. First, TE only impacts implicit calibration when SPE is present. Second, transient changes occurring when the target is displaced to manipulate TE has an attenuating effect on implicit recalibration, perhaps due to attention being directed away from the sensory feedback.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.