RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Rabies virus with a destabilization domain added to its nucleoprotein spreads between neurons only if the domain is removed
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 550640
DO 10.1101/550640
A1 Jin, Lei
A1 Matsuyama, Makoto
A1 Sullivan, Heather A.
A1 Zhu, Mulangma
A1 Lavin, Thomas K.
A1 Hou, YuanYuan
A1 Lea, Nicholas E.
A1 Pruner, Maxwell T.
A1 Ferdínez, María Lucía Dam
A1 Wickersham, Ian R.
YR 2021
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/03/550640.abstract
AB Monosynaptic tracing using rabies virus is an important technique in neuroscience, allowing brain-wide labeling of neurons directly presynaptic to a targeted neuronal population. A 2017 article reported development of a noncytotoxic version – a major advance – based on attenuating the rabies virus by addition of a destabilization domain to the C-terminus of a viral protein. However, this modification did not appear to hinder the ability of the virus to spread between neurons. We analyzed two viruses provided by the authors and show here that both were mutants that had lost the intended modification, explaining the paper’s paradoxical results. We then made a virus that actually did have the intended modification and found that it did not spread under the conditions described in the original paper – namely, without an exogenous protease being expressed in order to remove the destabilization domain – but that it did spread, albeit with relatively low efficiency, if the protease was supplied. We conclude that the new approach is not robust but that it may become a viable technique given further optimization and validation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Rabies virus, which spreads between synaptically connected neurons, has been one of the primary tools used by neuroscientists to reveal the organization of the brain. A new modification to rabies virus was recently reported to allow the mapping of connected neurons without adverse effects on the cells’ health, unlike earlier versions. Here we show that the conclusions of that study were probably incorrect and based on having used viruses that had lost the intended modification because of mutations. We also show that a rabies virus that does retain the intended modification does not spread between neurons under the conditions reported previously; however, it does spread between neurons under different conditions, suggesting that the approach may be successful if refined further.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.