TY - JOUR T1 - The initial response of females towards congeneric males matches the propensity to hybridize in <em>Ophthalmotilapia</em> JF - bioRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.08.07.455508 SP - 2021.08.07.455508 AU - Maarten Van Steenberge AU - Noémie Jublier AU - Loïc Kéver AU - Sophie Gresham AU - Sofie Derycke AU - Jos Snoeks AU - Eric Parmentier AU - Pascal Poncin AU - Erik Verheyen Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/08/08/2021.08.07.455508.abstract N2 - Cichlid radiations often harbour closely related species with overlapping niches and distribution ranges. Such species sometimes hybridize in nature, which raises the question how can they coexist. This also holds for the Tanganyika mouthbrooders Ophthalmotilapia ventralis and O. nasuta. Earlier studies found indications of asymmetrical hybridisation with females of O. ventralis accepting males of O. nasuta, but not the other way around. We hypothesised that this was due to differences in the capacity for species recognition. Given the higher propensity of O. ventralis females towards hybridization, we expect a reduced ability for species recognition in O. ventralis females, compared to O. nasuta females. We staged two experiments, one focusing on 22 female O. nasuta and one on 21 female O. ventralis. These fish were placed in one half of a tank and briefly exposed to a conspecific or a heterospecific male, a conspecific female, or nothing (control). Female response was evaluated by scoring six tracking parameters and by noting the occurrence of ten discrete behaviours before and during the first encounter. Females always responded to the presence of another fish by approaching it. Remarkably, for both O. nasuta and O. ventralis, we did not find a different response between encounters with conspecific males and females. However, in agreement with our hypothesis, O. nasuta females behaved differently towards conspecific or heterospecific males, whereas O. ventralis females did not. When presented with a heterospecific male, O. nasuta females performed a lower number of ‘ram’ behaviours. Additionally, they never displayed the ‘flee’ behaviour, a component of the species’ mating repertoire that was seen in all but one of the presentations with a conspecific male. Our findings show that differences in species recognition at first encounter predict to a large degree the outcome of the mating process, even in the absence of mating behaviour.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest. ER -