@article {Mattison473942, author = {Siobh{\'a}n M. Mattison and Robert J. Quinlan and Darragh Hare}, title = {The expendable male hypothesis}, elocation-id = {473942}, year = {2019}, doi = {10.1101/473942}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory}, abstract = {Matriliny is a system of kinship in which descent and inheritance are conferred along the female line. The theoretically influential concept of the matrilineal puzzle posits that matriliny poses special problems for understanding men{\textquoteright}s roles in matrilineal societies. Ethnographic work describes the puzzle as the tension experienced by men between the desire to exert control over their natal kin (i.e., the lineage to which they belong) and over their affinal kin (i.e., their spouses and their biological children). Evolutionary work frames the paradox as one resulting from a man investing in his nieces and nephews at the expense of his own biological offspring. In both cases, the rationale for the puzzle rests on two fundamental assumptions: (i) that men are always in positions of authority over women and over resources; and (ii) that men are interested in the outcomes of parenting. In this paper, we posit a novel hypothesis that suggests that certain ecological conditions render men expendable within local kinship configurations, nullifying the above assumptions. This arises when (i) women, without significant assistance from men, are capable of meeting the subsistence needs of their families; and (ii) men have little to gain from parental investment in children. We conclude that the expendable male hypothesis may explain the evolution of matriliny in numerous cases, and by noting that female-centered approaches that call into doubt assumptions inherent to male-centered models of kinship are justified in evolutionary perspective.}, URL = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/03/05/473942}, eprint = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2019/03/05/473942.full.pdf}, journal = {bioRxiv} }