RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Shorter constant work rate cycling tests as proxies for longer tests in highly trained cyclists
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 2021.10.12.464126
DO 10.1101/2021.10.12.464126
A1 Chantelle du Plessis
A1 Mark Andrews
A1 Lachlan J G Mitchell
A1 Jodie Cochrane Wilkie
A1 Trish King
A1 Anthony J Blazevich
YR 2021
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/12/2021.10.12.464126.abstract
AB Severe-intensity constant work rate (CWR) cycling tests are useful for monitoring training progression and adaptation as they impose significant physiological and psychological strain and thus simulate the high-intensity competition environment. However, fatiguing tests require substantial recovery and may disrupt athlete training or competition preparation. Therefore, the development of a brief, minimally fatiguing test providing comparable information is desirable.Purpose To determine whether physiological variables measured during, and functional decline in maximal power output immediately after, a 2-min CWR test can act as a proxy for 4-min test outcomes.Methods Physiological stress was monitored and pre-to-post-CWR changes in 10-s sprint power computed (to estimate performance fatigability) during 2- and 4-min CWR tests in high-level cyclists.Results The 2-min CWR test evoked a smaller decline in sprint mechanical power (32% vs. 47%, p<0.001), however both the physiological variables and sprint mechanical power were independently and strongly correlated between 2- and 4-min tests. Differences in V·O2peak and blood lactate concentration in both CWR tests were strongly associated with the decline in sprint mechanical power.Conclusion Physiological variables measured during, and the loss in sprint mechanical power measured after, a severe-intensity 2-min CWR test were less than in the 4-min test. Yet strong correlations between 2- and 4-min test outcomes indicated that the 2-min test can be used as a proxy for the longer test. Because shorter tests are less strenuous, they should have less impact on training and competition preparation and may therefore be more practically applicable within the elite performance environment.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.