RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Quantifying Numerical and Spatial Reliability of Amygdala and Hippocampal Subdivisions in FreeSurfer
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 2020.06.12.149203
DO 10.1101/2020.06.12.149203
A1 Isabella Kahhale
A1 Nicholas J Buser
A1 Christopher R. Madan
A1 Jamie L. Hanson
YR 2021
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/10/29/2020.06.12.149203.abstract
AB On-going, large-scale neuroimaging initiatives can aid in uncovering neurobiological causes and correlates of poor mental health, disease pathology, and many other important conditions. As projects grow in scale with hundreds, even thousands, of individual participants and scans collected, quantification of brain structures by automated algorithms is becoming the only truly tractable approach. Here, we assessed the spatial and numerical reliability for newly deployed automated segmentation of hippocampal subfields and amygdala nuclei in FreeSurfer 7. In a sample of participants with repeated structural imaging scans (N=923), we found numerical reliability (as assessed by intraclass correlations, ICCs) was reasonable: ∼95% of hippocampal subfields have “excellent” numerical reliability (ICCs≥0.90), however, only 67% of amygdala subnuclei met this same threshold. Spatial reliability was similarly reasonable, with 58% of hippocampal subfields and 44% of amygdala subnuclei having Dice coefficients≥0.70. Notably, multiple regions had poor numerical and/or spatial reliability. We also examined correlations between spatial reliability and person-level factors (e.g., participant age; T1 image quality). Both sex and image scan quality were related to variations in spatial reliability metrics. Examined collectively, our work suggests caution should be exercised for a few hippocampal subfields and amygdala nuclei with more variable reliability.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.