PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Orellana, Gabriel A.
AU  - Caceres-Delpiano, Javier
AU  - Ibañez, Roberto
AU  - Dunne, Michael P.
AU  - Alvarez, Leonardo
TI  - Protein sequence sampling and prediction from structural data
AID  - 10.1101/2021.09.06.459171
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 2021.09.06.459171
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/22/2021.09.06.459171.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2021/11/22/2021.09.06.459171.full
AB  - The increasing integration between protein engineering and machine learning has led to many interesting results. A problem still to solve is to evaluate the likelihood that a sequence will fold into a target structure. This problem can be also viewed as sequence prediction from a known structure.In the current work, we propose improvements in the recent architecture of Geometric Vector Perceptrons [1] in order to optimize the sampling of sequences from a known backbone structure. The proposed model differs from the original in that there is: (i) no updating in the vectorial embedding, only in the scalar one, (ii) only one layer of decoding. The first aspect improves the accuracy of the model and reduces the use of memory, the second allows for training of the model with several tasks without incurring data leakage.We treat the trained classifier as an Energy-Based Model and sample sequences by sampling amino acids in a non-autoreggresive manner in the empty positions of the sequence using energy-guided criteria and followed by random mutation optimization. We improve the median identity of samples from 40.2% to 44.7%.An additional question worth investigating is whether sampled and original sequences fold into similar structures independent of their identity. We chose proteins in our test set whose sampled sequences show low identity (under 30%) but for which our model predicted favorable energies. We used AlphaFold [2, 3] and observed that the predicted structures for sampled sequences highly resemble the predicted structures for original sequences, with an average TM-score of 0.84.Competing Interest StatementProvisional patent applications have been filed based on the results presented here.