RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Geometric control of Myosin-II orientation during axis elongation
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 2022.01.12.476069
DO 10.1101/2022.01.12.476069
A1 M.F. Lefebvre
A1 N.H. Claussen
A1 N.P. Mitchell
A1 H.J. Gustafson
A1 S.J. Streichan
YR 2022
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/01/12/2022.01.12.476069.abstract
AB The actomyosin cytoskeleton is a crucial driver of morphogenesis. Yet how the behavior of large-scale cytoskeletal patterns in deforming tissues emerges from the interplay of geometry, genetics, and mechanics remains incompletely understood. Convergent extension flow in D. melanogaster embryos provides the opportunity to establish a quantitative understanding of the dynamics of anisotropic non-muscle myosin II. Cell-scale analysis of protein localization in fixed embryos suggests that there are complex rules governing how the control of myosin anisotropy is regulated by gene expression patterns. However, technical limitations have impeded quantitative and dynamic studies of this process at the whole embryo level, leaving the role of geometry open. Here we combine in toto live imaging with quantitative analysis of molecular dynamics to characterize the distribution of myosin anisotropy and corresponding genetic patterning. We found pair rule gene expression continuously deformed, flowing with the tissue frame. In contrast, myosin anisotropy orientation remained nearly static, aligned with the stationary dorsal-ventral axis of the embryo. We propose myosin recruitment by a geometrically defined static source, potentially related to the embryo-scale epithelial tension, and account for transient deflections by the interplay of cytoskeletal turnover with junction reorientation by flow. With only one parameter, this model quantitatively accounts for the time course of myosin anisotropy orientation in wild-type, twist, and even-skipped embryos as well as embryos with perturbed egg geometry. Geometric patterning of the cytoskeleton suggests a simple physical strategy to ensure a robust flow and formation of shape.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.