PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Lijun An AU - Jianzhong Chen AU - Pansheng Chen AU - Tong He AU - Christopher Chen AU - Juan Helen Zhou AU - B.T. Thomas Yeo AU - the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative AU - the Australian Imaging Biomarkers and Lifestyle Study of Aging TI - Goal-specific brain MRI harmonization AID - 10.1101/2022.03.05.483077 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - bioRxiv PG - 2022.03.05.483077 4099 - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/07/2022.03.05.483077.short 4100 - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/07/2022.03.05.483077.full AB - There is significant interest in pooling magnetic resonance image (MRI) data from multiple datasets to enable mega-analysis. Harmonization is typically performed to reduce heterogeneity when pooling MRI data across datasets. Most MRI harmonization algorithms do not explicitly consider downstream application performance during harmonization. However, the choice of downstream application might influence what might be considered as study-specific confounds. Therefore, ignoring downstream applications during harmonization might potentially limit downstream performance. Here we propose a goal-specific harmonization framework that utilizes downstream application performance to regularize the harmonization procedure. Our framework can be integrated with a wide variety of harmonization models based on deep neural networks, such as the recently proposed conditional variational autoencoder (cVAE) harmonization model. Three datasets from three different continents with a total of 2787 participants and 10085 anatomical T1 scans were used for evaluation. We found that cVAE removed more dataset differences than the widely used ComBat model, but at the expense of removing desirable biological information as measured by downstream prediction of mini mental state examination (MMSE) scores and clinical diagnoses. On the other hand, our goal-specific cVAE (gcVAE) was able to remove as much dataset differences as cVAE, while improving downstream cross-sectional prediction of MMSE scores and clinical diagnoses.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.