TY - JOUR T1 - Analysis of science journalism reveals gender and regional disparities in coverage JF - bioRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.06.21.449261 SP - 2021.06.21.449261 AU - Natalie R. Davidson AU - Casey S. Greene Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/03/21/2021.06.21.449261.abstract N2 - Science journalism is a critical way in which the public can remain informed and benefit from new scientific findings. Such journalism also shapes the public’s view of the current state of scientific findings and legitimizes experts. Those covering science can only cite and quote a limited number of sources. Sources may be identified by the journalist’s research or by recommendations by other scientists. In both cases, biases may influence who is identified and ultimately included as an expert. To analyze possible biases in science journalism, we analyzed 22,001 non-research articles published by Nature. We chose to analyze Nature non-research articles since it’s research articles provide a natural comparator. Our analysis considered two possible sources of disparity: gender and name origin. To explore these sources of disparity, we extracted cited authors’ names as well as extracted names of quoted speakers. While citations and quotations within a piece do not reflect the entire information-gathering process, they can provide insight into the demographics of visible sources. We then used the extracted names to predict gender and name origin of the cited authors and speakers.In order to appropriately quantify the level of difference, we must identify a suitable reference set for comparison. We chose first and last authors within primary research articles in Nature and a subset of Springer Nature articles in the same time period as our comparator. In our analysis, we found a skew towards male quotation in Nature science journalism-related articles. However, quotation is trending toward equal representation at a faster rate than first and last authorship in academic publishing. Interestingly, we found that the gender disparity in Nature quotes was column-dependent, with the “Career Features” column reaching gender parity. Our name origin analysis found a significant over-representation of names with predicted Celtic/English origin and under-representation of names with a predicted East Asian origin. This finding was observed both in extracted quotes and journal citations, but dampened in citations.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest. ER -