RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 DOT1L activity affects cell lineage progression in the developing brain by controlling metabolic programs JF bioRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory SP 2022.04.08.487591 DO 10.1101/2022.04.08.487591 A1 Bismark Appiah A1 Camilla L. Fullio A1 Christiane Haffner A1 Patrice Zeis A1 Martin Treppner A1 Patrick Bovio A1 Arquimedes Cheffer A1 Ilaria Bertani A1 Harald Binder A1 Dominic GrĂ¼n A1 Nereo Kalebic A1 Elena Taverna A1 Tanja Vogel YR 2022 UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/04/12/2022.04.08.487591.abstract AB Cortical neurogenesis depends on the tight balance between self-renewal and differentiation of apical progenitors (APs), the key progenitor type generating all other neural cells including neocortical neurons. We here report the activity of the histone methyltransferase DOT1L as a gatekeeper for AP cell identity. Combining lineage tracing with single-cell RNA sequencing of clonally related cells, we explore consequences of DOT1L inhibition on AP lineage progression during neurogenesis in the embryonic mouse neocortex. At the cellular level, DOT1L inhibition led to increased neurogenesis driven by a shift from asymmetric self-renewing to symmetric neurogenic divisions of APs. At the molecular level, we show that DOT1L activity preserved AP identity by promoting transcription of a gene set involved in AP metabolism. On a mechanistic level, DOT1L inhibition increased expression of metabolic genes, including microcephaly-associated Asparagine synthetase (Asns) and overexpression of ASNS in APs resulted in increased neuronal differentiation. Asns expression was predicted to be controlled through EZH2 and we show that DOT1L activity allows PRC2-mediated repression of Asns expression. Importantly, inhibition of ASNS activity rescued increased AP differentiation upon DOT1L inhibition. Our data show that DOT1L activity/PRC2 crosstalk controls AP lineage progression by regulating AP metabolism, and they provide a mechanistic view on how DOT1L activity might affect neocortical neurogenesis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.