PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Heil, Benjamin J. AU - Crawford, Jake AU - Greene, Casey S. TI - The Effects of Nonlinear Signal on Expression-Based Prediction Performance AID - 10.1101/2022.06.22.497194 DP - 2022 Jan 01 TA - bioRxiv PG - 2022.06.22.497194 4099 - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/06/2022.06.22.497194.short 4100 - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/07/06/2022.06.22.497194.full AB - Those building predictive models from transcriptomic data are faced with two conflicting perspectives. The first, based on the inherent high dimensionality of biological systems, supposes that complex non-linear models such as neural networks will better match complex biological systems. The second, imagining that complex systems will still be well predicted by simple dividing lines prefers linear models that are easier to interpret. We compare multi-layer neural networks and logistic regression across multiple prediction tasks on GTEx and Recount3 datasets and find evidence in favor of both possibilities. We verified the presence of non-linear signal for transcriptomic prediction tasks by removing the predictive linear signal with Limma, and showed the removal ablated the performance of linear methods but not non-linear ones. However, we also found that the presence of non-linear signal was not necessarily sufficient for neural networks to outperform logistic regression. Our results demonstrate that while multi-layer neural networks may be useful for making predictions from gene expression data, including a linear baseline model is critical because while biological systems are highdimensional, effective dividing lines for predictive models may not be.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.