TY - JOUR T1 - Taxonomy of interventions at academic institutions to improve research quality JF - bioRxiv DO - 10.1101/2022.12.08.519666 SP - 2022.12.08.519666 AU - Alexandra R Davidson AU - Ginny Barbour AU - Shinichi Nakagawa AU - Alex O. Holcombe AU - Fiona Fidler AU - Paul P Glasziou Y1 - 2022/01/01 UR - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2022/12/10/2022.12.08.519666.abstract N2 - Research institutions and researchers have become increasingly concerned about poor research reproducibility and replicability, and research waste more broadly. Research institutions play an important role and understanding their intervention options is important. This review aims to identify and classify possible interventions to improve research quality, reduce waste, and improve reproducibility and replicability within research-performing institutions.Taxonomy development steps: 1) use of an exemplar paper of journal-level research quality improvement interventions, 2) 2-stage search in PubMed using seed and exemplar articles, and forward and backward citation searching to identify articles evaluating or describing research quality improvement, 3) elicited draft taxonomy feedback from researchers at an open-sciences conference workshop, and 4) cycles of revisions from the research team.The search identified 11 peer-reviewed articles on relevant interventions. Overall, 93 interventions were identified from peer-review literature and researcher reporting. Interventions covered before, during, and after study conduct research stages and whole of institution. Types of intervention included: Tools, Education & Training, Incentives, Modelling & Mentoring, Review & Feedback, Expert involvement, and Policies & Procedures. Identified areas for research institutions to focus on to improve research quality and for further research includes improving incentives to implement quality research practices, evaluating current interventions, encourage no- or low-cost/high-benefit interventions, examine institution research culture, and encourage mentor-mentee relationships.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest. ER -