RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Modeling tissue co-regulation to estimate tissue-specific contributions to disease
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 2022.08.25.505354
DO 10.1101/2022.08.25.505354
A1 Tiffany Amariuta
A1 Katherine Siewert-Rocks
A1 Alkes L. Price
YR 2023
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2023/03/26/2022.08.25.505354.abstract
AB Integrative analyses of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and gene expression data across diverse tissues and cell types have enabled the identification of putative disease-critical tissues. However, co-regulation of genetic effects on gene expression across tissues makes it difficult to distinguish biologically causal tissues from tagging tissues. While previous work emphasized the potential of accounting for tissue co-regulation, tissue-specific disease effects have not previously been formally modeled. Here, we introduce a new method, tissue co-regulation score regression (TCSC), that disentangles causal tissues from tagging tissues and partitions disease heritability (or covariance) into tissue-specific components. TCSC leverages gene-disease association statistics across tissues from transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS), which implicate both causal and tagging genes and tissues. TCSC regresses TWAS chi-square statistics (or products of z-scores) on tissue co-regulation scores reflecting correlations of predicted gene expression across genes and tissues. In simulations, TCSC distinguishes causal tissues from tagging tissues while controlling type I error. We applied TCSC to GWAS summary statistics for 78 diseases and complex traits (average N = 302K) and gene expression prediction models for 48 GTEx tissues. TCSC identified 21 causal tissue-trait pairs at 5% FDR, including well-established findings, biologically plausible novel findings (e.g. aorta artery and glaucoma), and increased specificity of known tissue-trait associations (e.g. subcutaneous adipose, but not visceral adipose, and HDL). TCSC also identified 17 causal tissue-trait covariance pairs at 5% FDR. For the positive genetic covariance between BMI and red blood cell count, brain substantia nigra contributed positive covariance while pancreas contributed negative covariance; this suggests that genetic covariance may reflect distinct tissue-specific contributions. Overall, TCSC is a precise method for distinguishing causal tissues from tagging tissues, improving our understanding of disease and complex trait biology.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.