RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Corticospinal excitability at rest outside of a task does not differ from task intertrial intervals in healthy adults
JF bioRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
SP 2024.02.05.578973
DO 10.1101/2024.02.05.578973
A1 Bakken, Kate
A1 Horton, Chris
A1 Fisher, Mitchell
A1 Wadsley, Corey G.
A1 Greenhouse, Ian
YR 2024
UL http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2024/02/06/2024.02.05.578973.abstract
AB Human corticospinal excitability modulates during movement, when muscles are active, but also at rest, when muscles are not active. These changes in resting motor system excitability can be transient or longer lasting. Evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) studies suggests even relatively short periods of motor learning on the order of minutes can have lasting effects on resting corticospinal excitability. Whether individuals are able to return corticospinal excitability to out-of-task resting levels during the intertrial intervals of behavioral tasks that do not include an intended motor learning component is an important question. Here, in twenty-six healthy young adults, we used single-pulse TMS and electromyography (EMG) to measure motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during two different resting contexts: 1) intertrial intervals of a choice-reaction time task, and 2) outside the task. In both contexts, five TMS intensities were used to evaluate possible differences in recruitment of corticospinal output. We hypothesized resting state excitability would be greater during intertrial intervals than out-of-task rest, reflected in larger MEP amplitudes. Contrary to our hypothesis, we observed no significant difference in MEP amplitudes between out-of-task rest and in-task intertrial intervals, and instead found evidence of equivalence, indicating that humans are able to return to a stable motor resting state within seconds after a response. These data support the interpretation that rest is a uniform motor state in the healthy nervous system. In the future, our data may be a useful reference for motor disorder populations with an impaired ability to return to rest.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.