@article {Baum185397, author = {Graham L. Baum and David R. Roalf and Philip A. Cook and Rastko Ciric and Adon F.G. Rosen and Cedric Xia and Mark A. Elliot and Kosha Ruparel and Ragini Verma and Birkan Tunc and Ruben C. Gur and Raquel E. Gur and Danielle S. Bassett and Theodore D. Satterthwaite}, title = {The Impact of In-Scanner Head Motion on Structural Connectivity Derived from Diffusion Tensor Imaging}, elocation-id = {185397}, year = {2017}, doi = {10.1101/185397}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory}, abstract = {Multiple studies have shown that data quality is a critical confound in the construction of brain networks derived from functional MRI. This problem is particularly relevant for studies of human brain development where important variables (such as participant age) are correlated with data quality. Nevertheless, the impact of head motion on estimates of structural connectivity derived from diffusion tractography methods remains poorly characterized. Here, we evaluated the impact of in-scanner head motion on structural connectivity using a sample of 949 participants (ages 8-23 years old) who passed a rigorous quality assessment protocol for diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) acquired as part of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort. Structural brain networks were constructed for each participant using both deterministic and probabilistic tractography. We hypothesized that subtle variation in head motion would systematically bias estimates of structural connectivity and confound developmental inference, as observed in previous studies of functional connectivity. Even following quality assurance and retrospective correction for head motion, eddy currents, and field distortions, in-scanner head motion significantly impacted the strength of structural connectivity in a consistency-and length-dependent manner. Specifically, increased head motion was associated with reduced estimates of structural connectivity for high-consistency network edges, which included both short-and long-range connections. In contrast, motion inflated estimates of structural connectivity for low-consistency network edges that were primarily shorter-range. Finally, we demonstrate that age-related differences in head motion can both inflate and obscure developmental inferences on structural connectivity. Taken together, these data delineate the systematic impact of head motion on structural connectivity, and provide a critical context for identifying motion-related confounds in studies of structural brain network development.}, URL = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/09/07/185397}, eprint = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/09/07/185397.full.pdf}, journal = {bioRxiv} }