PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Wenbin Mei
AU  - Markus G Stetter
AU  - Daniel J Gates
AU  - Michelle C Stitzer
AU  - Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
TI  - Adaptation in plant genomes: bigger is different
AID  - 10.1101/196501
DP  - 2017 Jan 01
TA  - bioRxiv
PG  - 196501
4099  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/10/10/196501.short
4100  - http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/10/10/196501.full
AB  - Here we have proposed the functional space hypothesis, positing that mutational target size scales with genome size, impacting the number, source, and genomic location of beneficial mutations that contribute to adaptation. Though motivated by preliminary evidence, mostly from Arabidopsis and maize, more data are needed before any rigorous assessment of the hypothesis can be made. If correct, the functional space hypothesis suggests that we should expect plants with large genomes to exhibit more functional mutations outside of genes, more regulatory variation, and likely less signal of strong selective sweeps reducing diversity. These differences have implications for how we study the evolution and development of plant genomes, from where we should look for signals of adaptation to what patterns we expect adaptation to leave in genetic diversity or gene expression data. While flowering plant genomes vary across more than three orders of magnitude in size, most studies of both functional and evolutionary genomics have focused on species at the extreme small edge of this scale. Our hypothesis predicts that methods and results from these small genomes may not replicate well as we begin to explore large plant genomes. Finally, while we have focused here on evidence from plant genomes, we see no a priori reason why similar arguments might not hold in other taxa as well.